Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> September 9, 2003 <br /> • Page 3 <br /> demolish the structure and complete the public improvements would cost approximately$16 <br /> 2 million for Phase I and$4 million for Phases II and III. She discussed the developer's proposal <br /> 3 for payment for land and special assessments for the Phase I development to assist in offsetting <br /> 4 this cost. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Ms. Kvilvang explained, based upon the latest Sources and Uses from the development team, it <br /> 7 was anticipated the Phase I development would generate approximately$10.5 million in present <br /> 8 value tax increment. She added, of this increment, it was anticipated the development team <br /> 9 would require approximately$7.5 million to $9 million to complete the redevelopment. She <br /> 10 warned these numbers were estimates and the final amount of increment would be presented <br /> 11 with the final Term Sheet. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Ms. Kvilvang stated all TIF calculations currently had included fiscal disparities being paid <br /> 14 within the district,pursuant to policy discussions with City staff and Council. She added this <br /> 15 option was currently financially viable since the current TIF projects showed excess increment <br /> 16 for the development. She noted the City may consider, however, keeping fiscal disparities <br /> 17 within the district for coverage on a Fannie Mae loan for the acquisition of the three commercial <br /> 18 properties needed for the Phase IA For Sale housing units. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Ms. Kvilvang indicated currently all TIF calculations showed 5% of available tax increment <br /> 21 being available for administration. She explained the City might elect to subordinate its 5% <br /> 22 administration until the entire development comes on line if the development required more than <br /> 95%of the TIF for actual redevelopment costs or coverage of bonds. She added it was <br /> IP anticipated this would not be required at this time. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Ms. Kvilvang stated it was anticipated the development team would finance their development <br /> 27 costs up front and they would request the City to "take them out" after the development was <br /> 28 completed through the issuance of tax-exempt TIF bonds. She noted this was a tool used in <br /> 29 many of the metropolitan communities to assist developers with development and was a low risk <br /> 30 proposition for the City, since the developments would be constructed and paying taxes when the <br /> 31 City was issuing these bonds. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Ms. Kvilvang indicated 39' Avenue would be reconstructed and upgrades would be made to the <br /> 34 sanitary sewer lines as well. She stated it was anticipated it would cost approximately$1.7 <br /> 35 million to $2.1 million to complete these improvements and the cost would be assessed to and <br /> 36 paid for by the development and other benefiting properties within the TIF district. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Ms. Kvilvang stated she knew the city park was an important part of the development. She <br /> 39 indicated the development team would pay for the park improvements, which were estimated to <br /> 40 cost approximately$1.43 million. She added they would be reimbursed by the City for a portion <br /> 41 or all of the park improvements through park dedication fees generated from the development <br /> 42 and any grants the City might receive. She noted the park improvements might be phased over a <br /> 43 three-year period if the City did not receive the $900,000 in LCDA funds it requested from the <br /> 44 Metropolitan Council. She explained a few changes had been made to the park concept plan as <br /> 0 they related to future maintenance issues. <br />