Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> September 9, 2003 <br /> • Page 6 <br /> Ms. Kvilvang noted the developer of the For Sale housing units anticipated a 12%profit on the <br /> 2 development. She explained, once the developer obtained this profit margin, a"pay back" <br /> 3 would be provided to the City, which would be a prorated share of this profit, and, if the project <br /> 4 profit exceeded 15%,the City's prorated share of the profit would be increased. She added the <br /> 5 proration of the profit sharing was still being negotiated and would be finalized by the next <br /> 6 Council meeting. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Ms. Kvilvang indicated a mutually agreed-upon preliminary development proformas for the For <br /> 9 Sale housing and commercial development would be attached as an exhibit to the Development <br /> 10 Agreement. She stated this would be the basis for determination of assistance for the <br /> 11 developments and the actual development proformas would be compared with the preliminary <br /> 12 development proformas when the developments were completed. She explained, if the projects <br /> 13 performed better than anticipated and the For Sale Developer received the required profit amount <br /> 14 of 12% and the Commercial Developer met the construction and lease goals, the excess proceeds <br /> 15 would be disbursed to the City as excess TIF and would be made available for Phase II and <br /> 16 Phase II developments within the TIF district. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Ms. Kvilvang stated the City would use its best efforts to obtain LCDA and Tax Base <br /> 19 Revitalization grant funding and any other available funding from Metropolitan, State and <br /> 20 Federal sources. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Ms. Kvilvang stated the purchase price of land for each use would be reviewed and must be <br /> 0 shown to be at market and similar to what other projects were paying. <br /> 25 Mr. Mornson asked if the TIF note being discussed was$7.5 million to $9 million. Ms. <br /> 26 Kvilvang responded three notes would probably be involved, as they would be based on the <br /> 27 individual components. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Mr. Mornson asked if she was proposing approximately$7.5 million. Ms. Kvilvang stated that <br /> 30 was correct. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Mr. Mornson asked if the City would have increments pay for any cost overrun. Ms. Kvilvang <br /> 33 stated that was correct. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Mr. Mornson asked who made payments on the first two years of the Fannie Mae loans. Ms. <br /> 36 Kvilvang responded the loans would be negotiated so payment would not be needed the first two <br /> 37 years. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Mr. Mornson asked if the purpose of the general obligation of the City was to give Fannie Mae <br /> 40 security. Ms. Kvilvang responded that was correct. She added it was the City saying they would <br /> 41 pay the tab if needed. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Ms. Kvilvang stated the City had a great development opportunity with an excellent <br /> `44 development team. <br /> Councilmember Faust stated many items had been "hammered out" in the last two weeks and he <br /> 47 felt"we are almost there." He noted Council's concern regarding the general obligation should <br />