My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 10142003
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2003
>
CC MINUTES 10142003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:56:49 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:56:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
34
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 2003
SP Name
CC MINUTES 10142003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> October 14, 2003 <br /> • Page 10 <br /> B. Resolution 03-087, re: Reject bids for construction of a Fire Station facility. <br /> 2 Mr. Benson noted the BP-2 bids, even with deduct alternates 6 and 7, for the Fire Station came <br /> 3 in at an amount that caused the construction budget to be exceeded by nearly 20%; therefore, it <br /> 4 was recommended the Fire Station bids be rejected and the project be rebid in order to meet the <br /> 5 approved construction amount of$1.7 million. He added the project team, including Kraus- <br /> 6 Anderson, Oertel Architects and City staff, had been working diligently to reduce areas of the <br /> 7 building, which would ultimately result in meeting the approved budget. He indicated the rebid <br /> 8 for the Fire Station would take place sometime in January of 2004. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Motion by Councilmember Sparks to adopt Resolution 03-087 relating to construction of a fire <br /> 11 station, rejecting any and all bids received for Bid Package No. 2. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Councilmember Horst asked if Mr. Benson felt the redesign would be ready to rebid in January <br /> 14 "in a better climate." He also asked when construction would begin. Mr. Oertel responded there <br /> 15 were advantages to rebidding in January. He indicated redesigning was needed, as the bids were <br /> 16 significantly higher than the budget. He noted the redesign would incorporate a square-footage <br /> 17 deduction with the result being a one-story building instead of two stories. He added those <br /> 18 changes would mean heating expenses would also be reduced. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Mr. Oertel stated it was a key time to bid, as people were looking forward to spring; therefore, if <br /> 21 a good bid was received, work could begin in the spring. <br /> 22 <br /> Councilmember Horst stated he assumed the message was received from the last work session <br /> that the design needed to be an attractive centerpiece for the community. Mr. Oertel replied the <br /> 25 image was virtually identical to the two-story scheme. He noted, by removing the second floor, <br /> 26 two stairs, the elevator and high electrical costs had been eliminated. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Councilmember Horst asked if there was still adequate training room. Mr. Oertel responded <br /> 29 downsizing had taken place in that area; however, he still felt the scheme was workable. He <br /> 30 added the third bay was so important to staff that they were willing to sacrifice some of the <br /> 31 creature comfort areas to keep it. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Councilmember Horst asked if Council would get another look at the plan before it was rebid. <br /> 34 Mr. Oertel responded Council would see it one or two more times. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Councilmember Faust stated he appreciated the team effort to accommodate the community's <br /> 37 needs while monitoring the costs. He asked for a time line and if the plan was for a January/ <br /> 38 February bid. Mr. Oertel responded the plan would be solidified over the next two to three <br /> 39 weeks, at which time the redesign would be completed. He stated bids would be put out in <br /> 40 January of 2004 and due in February of 2004. Mr. Benson added construction should begin in <br /> 41 April of 2004 and be completed around November of 2004. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Councilmember Faust stated he was concerned the project was falling behind because of the <br /> 44 rebid. <br /> it Mayor Hodson indicated the original completion date was June of 2004 and now it was set for <br /> 47 November of 2004, which was only a difference of five months. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.