Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> December 8, 2003 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Councilmember Faust stated taking out radiant infloor heating and installing overhead radiant <br /> 2 had been discussed. He indicated he understood there was an energy savings with infloor <br /> 3 heating; however, the infloor cost was initially higher but had a payback of approximately two to <br /> 4 three years. Mr. Oertel responded he was not certain that was true, as he had worked on many <br /> 5 buildings with infloor radiant and overhead radiant. He cited examples that suggested the <br /> 6 payback was not that significant. He explained he thought the differences had more to do with <br /> 7 preference and comfort. He noted a mechanic working in a bay would prefer the infloor and the <br /> 8 heat could be lowered because it was on the floor. He added overhead radiant was better for <br /> 9 equipment and apparatus, however. He indicated he did not believe the savings would be <br /> 10 significant because people were not working on the floor. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Councilmember Faust asked if the boilers used for infloor versus ceiling would be different or if <br /> 13 the same one could be used, such as a modulating condensing boiler. Mr. Oertel responded <br /> 14 boilers could be very efficient; however, the new building did not require boilers. He noted <br /> 15 quite a bit of money was saved by using a direct-fired radiant overhead and then using package <br /> 16 units in the living and working areas. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. <br /> 19 A. Resolution 03-103, re: Call for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Tax <br /> 20 Increment Bonds, Series 1995B. <br /> 21 City Manager Morrison noted the City of St. Anthony issued $2.65 million in bonds to fund a <br /> portion of the Community Center(City Hall)project. He explained the debt service for these <br /> bonds was paid from Kenzie tax increment revenue and the increment from the bonds had <br /> 24 exceeded debt service requirements; therefore, the City had sufficient funds to pay off the <br /> 25 outstanding bonds. He stated the call date on these bonds was February 2004 and, in order to <br /> 26 call the bonds on that date, it was necessary to issue a call notice 30 days prior to February 1, <br /> 27 2004. He indicated Resolution 03-103 was prepared to authorize the bond call and, once the <br /> 28 resolution was approved, Ehlers and Associates would prepare and deliver the call notice and <br /> 29 coordinate the final payout. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Mr. Morrison stated the City had invested the funds required to redeem the outstanding bonds <br /> 32 and these investments would be converted to cash prior to the closing date. He indicated the <br /> 33 amount of funds required at closing was estimated at $1.28 million plus accrued interest and <br /> 34 Ehlers would coordinate the transfer of funds required to complete this call with Finance <br /> 35 Director Larson. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Mr. Morrison noted the City initiated action to decertify the Kenzie tax increment district earlier <br /> 38 this year, which would be effective for the 2004 tax year. He added it was expected the City's <br /> 39 tax capacity would increase by about 6%and this increased base would provide a significant <br /> 40 benefit for taxpayers. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Sparks, to adopt Resolution 03- <br /> 43 103 calling for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series <br /> 0 1995B,dated December 1, 1995. <br /> 46 Motion carried unanimously. <br />