Laserfiche WebLink
02/01/96 THU 11:07 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY [a 009 <br /> 7z <br /> To meet the three-year deadline, it has been proposed that bond's 136 <br /> issued by April 26. The requirement is that the bonds be "issued" by such date; <br /> which means that the closing of the bonds has occurred. At our m6L66hg last *eek, <br /> it was indicated that the real estate closing for the CUB Foods store site is expected to <br /> take place in mid-April. Until the City actually knows SUPERVALU is committed <br /> to construct the CUB Foods store it should not sell the bonds because of the <br /> significant cost to the City if it issues the bonds and the project does not proceed. <br /> Given the history of the Apache Plaza redevelopment proposal, we really will not be <br /> certain that the CUB Foods store will be constructed until SUPERVALU has closed <br /> on the purchase of the site. Since this closing is expected to be shortly before the <br /> April 26 deadline, this will not leave the City with enough time to sell and close a <br /> definitive bond issue. <br /> At our meeting with representatives of Ste. Marie Company last week <br /> we discussed having the City issue a temporary tax increment bond to Ste. Marie <br /> Company at the time of the real estate closing in order to satisfy the three-year <br /> deadline. This temporary tax increment bond would then be refunded in 45-60 days <br /> later with the proceeds of the definitive TIF Bonds. This issuance of the temporary <br /> tax increment bond would qualify as the issuance of bonds for the purpose of <br /> meeting the three-year deadline. • <br /> At the time of issuance of the temporary bond the redevelopment <br /> agreement and assessment agreement with SUPERVALU will be entered into. Ste. <br /> Marie Company would sell the site to SUPERVALU and would receive a portion of <br /> the agreed purchase price from SUPERVALU, with the City issuing the temporary <br /> tax increment bonds to Ste_ Marie Company to cover the remainder of the purchase <br /> price. Ste. Marie Company would make a contribution to the City from the portion <br /> of the purchase price paid by SUPERVALU to cover the estimated present value of <br /> the LGA/HACA loss. The temporary bond would not bear interest, would mature <br /> in a short period (3-6 months) and be callable-on any date. <br /> While I am not aware of SUPERVALU's purchase price for the side, <br /> assume for purposes of an example that the purchase price for the site is $2,500;000, <br /> that the HRA agrees to a land write down amount of $1,860,000 (this is the amount <br /> requested by Ste. Marie Company), and that the estimated present value of the <br /> estimated LGA/HACA loss is $250,000. At the real estate closing, the City issues the <br /> temporary tax increment bond in the amount of $1,860,000 to Ste. Marie Cbrhpany, <br /> and SUPERVALU pays Ste. Marie Company $640;000 (which equals the $2,500,000 <br /> purchase price, less the principal amount of the $1,860,000 temporary tax increment <br /> bond). From the $640,000 it receives from SUPERVALU, Ste. Marie Company then <br /> pays $250,000 to the City to cover the estimated present value of the b7JA/HAC.A. <br /> loss. Following the purchase of the site by SUPERVALU, the City would promptly • <br /> proceed with the public sale of the definitive tax increment bonds. The definitive <br /> DORSEY & WHITNEY P.L.L.P. 2 <br />