My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 09031996
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1996
>
CC PACKET 09031996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:55:00 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
37
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1997
SP Name
CC PACKET 09031996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
08/20/96 TUE 12:52 FAX 6129407800 DORSEY WHITNEY <br /> Z <br /> • Ste. Marie Company, as owner of the property Yat Apache Plaza Shopping Center <br /> legally described as follows (the "Site"): <br /> Lot 5, Block 1, Silver Lake Center, according to the recorded plat thereof, <br /> Ramsey County, Minnesota, <br /> has applied for a variance from the required setback of a proposed new addition to <br /> the existing building on the Site from the west lot line of the Site. <br /> The Planning Commission, after a public hearing on the requested variance, has <br /> considered the facts and circumstances relating to the requested variance. <br /> The Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: <br /> 1. The subject matter of the application is within the scope of Section <br /> 1665.06 of the City Code. <br /> 2. Strict enforcement of the setback requirement with respect to the Site <br /> would cause an undue hardship because: <br /> (a) The setback in question is from a lot line which is adjoining an <br /> • interior driveway through a shopping center, and is not <br /> adjoining another development site. <br /> (b) The lot line on the opposite side of the Site from the setback in <br /> question is adjoining a county road, and is subject to county road <br /> setback requirements that would prohibit adequate expansion of <br /> the building on that side of the Site. <br /> (c) The proposed expansion of the building on the Site to <br /> accommodate a new City liquor store is a reasonable use of the <br /> Site. <br /> -(d) In view of the findings in (a), (b) and (c) above, the Site can not <br /> be put to a reasonable use without the variance. <br /> (e) Circumstances causing the hardship are created by the location of <br /> the Site between a county road right-of-way and an interior <br /> driveway through a shopping center, and were not created by the <br /> owner. <br /> (f) The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of <br /> • the locality. <br /> (g) Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the hardship. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.