Laserfiche WebLink
royal of the tax increment financing Plan, the <br /> Before or at the time of app s f rt in 'tin e <br /> . a shall make the following <br /> r n <br /> plan will afford maxim,muoPPoitunity . . . <br /> (d)That the tax increment financing P r e b private enterprise. <br /> for the development or redevelopment ofthe district RMied y P <br /> amending IVS'ii Stat. §273.74, subd..3). These changes were <br /> Lawn 1982, eh..523, art.38, sec. 5 t � �ent to be spent on activities outside the <br /> made for the specific purpose o£permittuig <br /> geographic boundaries of the TIF district Sd increment but within the broader project <br /> area that contained the TIT district. `. <br /> or <br /> The effective date of these char es, however, <br /> made the a 1language of this effective-date <br /> which certification was re ested er June 0 1982. • store intended the change in the <br /> provision is unambiguous sad clearly demonstrate ceilAcation request dates after June 30, <br /> law to permit pooling to apply only to TIF <br /> with <br /> 1982. <br /> • • e history or intent of the Resear h <br /> There is no 's initW <br /> dispute at the state level regarding the le Members of the House of Representatives <br /> lack of authorization to pool tax increment. <br /> amrch D attme� and the Office of the Legislate Auditor <br /> Department, Senate Counsel and est date on or after August 1, 1979 <br /> and <br /> . agree that pooling from a'TIF district rr attfication xequ <br /> d. <br /> on or before June 30, 1982 is not p <br /> ed that pooling tax increment from pre-1982 TIF <br /> As recently as 1997, the Legislature confirm Pooling authority <br /> e of 1 o <br /> districts was not permitted in the languag �a� n that authorized additional p <br /> for TIF <br /> authorities which experience a shortfall in tax increment revenue due to recent property tax <br /> class rate changes: . <br /> subdIvision <br /> Notwithstandingtpe provision of M'ionesota Statutes,section��� or disdri�fog' <br /> ncing aci i ff .� <br /> 2 and the provisions of the c s on w ad ore June 30, 1982, revenues <br /> which the request for certification war made <br /> derived from increments may be spent on acthities located outside of the district to <br /> pay binding obligations entered into before the day <br /> following final enactment. The <br /> ' onto be spent outside the district is limited to <br /> amount qualifying under tris subdivisi that cannot be <br /> an amount necessary <br /> to meet a binding obl Won of the other district <br /> aid by the other district be of the reduction in Class roved,s u��u g,Sby the <br /> ctiom <br /> P on must b PP in <br /> Use of increments under this authority <br /> commissioner of revenue. <br /> ---------------- <br /> s9 saws 1982,ch. 523,art.38, sec. 16. <br /> 25 <br /> L''d S3I 1I 0 WW JO 3n!)U I Wd t ti:20 66, 02 8dti ----- <br />