My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10051999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1999
>
CC PACKET 10051999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:51:24 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:51:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
37
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999
SP Name
CC PACKET 10051999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br /> • <br /> Mr. Michael Morrison <br /> September 21, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> auditing of the tax increment financing districts. Under the Tax Increment Financing Act tax <br /> increment financing districts are subject to different rules and restrictions based on the date of <br /> creation or certification of the district and the type of tax increment financing district. In <br /> connection with its enforcement activities the State Auditor has taken the position that the <br /> Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act does not permit the expenditure of tax increment <br /> revenue derived from a tax increment financing district outside the boundaries of the district if <br /> the request for certification of the original value of such tax increment financing district was filed <br /> with the County Auditor after July 31, 1979 and before July 1, 1982. Since the request for <br /> certification of the Kenzie TIF District was filed on June 29, 1982, it is the position of the State <br /> Auditor that "pooling" is not permitted for the Kenzie TIF District. When the State Auditor has <br /> identified instances of tax increment revenue from tax increment financing districts for which the <br /> request for certification was filed with the County Auditor after July 31, 1979 and before July 1, <br /> 1982 being spent by a public body on activities outside the geographic area of the district, it has <br /> sought repayment of the expenditure by the public body to the affected taxing jurisdictions. We <br /> • have disagreed with this interpretation of the Tax Increment Financing Act by the State Auditor <br /> and have taken the position that expenditure of tax increment revenue for activities outside of the <br /> boundaries of the district is permitted for districts for which the request for certification was filed <br /> with the County Auditor after July 31, 1979 and before July 1, 1982. <br /> This issue was clarified by the Minnesota Legislature by the adoption of an <br /> amendment to the Tax Increment Financing Act at its 1999 Session. This amendment provides <br /> that for districts for which the request for certification was filed with the County Auditor after <br /> July 31, 1979 and before July 1, 1982, expenditures of tax increment for such districts may be <br /> made on activities located outside of the geographic area of the district if: <br /> (i) the expenditures are made before December 31, <br /> 1999; or <br /> (ii) the expenditures are made to pay bonds to which <br /> such tax increment was pledged before April 1, <br /> 1999; or <br /> (iii) the expenditures are made under binding written <br /> agreements secured by increments from the district <br /> if the agreement was entered into before May 31, <br /> • 1999. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.