Laserfiche WebLink
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> RESOLUTION 91-038 <br /> A RESOLUTION OPPOSING 'POLICE BILL OF RIGHTS" LEGISLATION <br /> WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress is considering adoption of legislation that would pre-empt <br /> state and local laws and require cities to impose federal standards on the <br /> conduct of internal investigations of police misconduct by the city while <br /> providing police officers subject to such discipline the right to sue cities for <br /> monetary and other damages, including full reinstatement; and <br /> WHEREAS, these provisions restrict the authority and ability of the Police Chief to <br /> investigate allegations of police misconduct or use of excessive force; and <br /> WHEREAS, definitions provided in the legislation are so unclear that interpretations could <br /> prevent any measures without the need for formal hearings; and <br /> WHEREAS, restrictions raise the issue of whether police officers would no longer be <br /> subject to normal supervision; and <br /> WHEREAS, provisions raise the conduct of such disciplinary investigations to the level of <br /> criminal proceedings; and <br /> WHEREAS, 'Police Officers Bill of Rights" imposes the will of the federal government on <br /> matters that are clearly state and local labor relations issues; and <br /> WHEREAS, some states, including Minnesota, have adopted similar requirements, while <br /> others have rejected such legislation; and <br /> WHEREAS, the legislation directly interferes with local processes governing provision of <br /> police services; and <br /> WHEREAS, provisions appear to disallow local appointment of civilian review boards and <br /> require that the entire investigative file be open to the police officer under <br /> investigation while not providing personnel file information on such officers <br /> to those investigations; and <br /> WHEREAS, congress has failed to hold any hearings or to investigate the views of police <br /> officials and others who would be adversely affected by such restrictions; and <br /> WHEREAS, this proposal is unrelated to local government efforts to fight crime, control <br /> drug abuse and reduce violence, therefore should not be included in federal <br /> • anti-crime legislation. <br />