Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br /> b. Hennepin County re: Assessment ratio. The attached letter is informat- <br /> ional but I feel it shows we have been doing an excellent job of keeping our <br /> values in line as the law requires. <br /> ACTION: File <br /> c. Association of Metro Municipalities regarding Lord vacancy. <br /> -informational . <br /> d. League of Minr+esota Municipalities regarding local 320 arbitration award. <br /> Local 320 doesn't represent our police department and this arbitration decis- <br /> ion deals with only police departments batt the decision does effect what we <br /> will be paying our pol !ce department. In addition 320 does represent our <br /> fire departm3n.t. <br /> Because of the direct and indirect effect this couid have upon us and our <br /> future !inion negotiations I would recommend we agree to participate in the <br /> action. The cost would be well below $200. <br /> ACTION: Recommend approval . <br /> e. U.S. Post Office regardin,.; designation c,f commu:ilty and zip code. We <br /> received the enclosed letter this week from the postmaster. <br /> ACT i QN: Council <br /> • f. Rerairider. .Meet Ing November 19th 7:30 Wilshire Park regarding re- <br /> construction of County Road D-Informational . <br /> 10. Reports <br /> a. City trees-Informational <br /> b. Fire & Police Reports-Please call if you have any questions. <br /> H . Reports by Mayor, Manager & Council <br /> a. Repot by Tanager regarding bus stops. I talked to the MTC last week <br /> and they indicated they were still processing requests and would be in <br /> contact with the city in two or three weeks. <br /> b. Calendar Survey REport-Results enclosed. It appears that the residents <br /> surveyed are almost equally divided on the question of whether there should <br /> be calendar- issued and if there is a need for better communications. <br /> ACTION: Crunci 1 <br /> c. City Manager and Architect regarding bids received for remodeling Parkview <br /> for civic center. Enclosed is a laid tabiflation. You will note that the lEow <br /> bid is apnrox:mately double the original estimate for the work. We have met <br /> with the low bidder and discussed his bid and have determined that little <br /> could be saved unless we redesign the remodeling. We will have some drawings <br /> of possible redesigns available at the meeting. I might comment that the low <br /> • bidder indicated that he was not surprised to see the bid and the estimate be <br /> as far apart as they are. He indicated this is quite ccnimon with todays <br /> coed itIonS S. <br /> ACT1CN: Recommend we discuss thorcugh!y with architect and then determine <br /> covrae of action. <br />