Laserfiche WebLink
D� A <br /> • <br /> Summary Resort of School District Finance Advisory Committee <br /> A. Committee: <br /> The ad hoc Finance Committee was composed of members of the School Board, <br /> School Administrators,and designated representatives of various Blueprint task <br /> forces. The committee was chaired by the undersigned. The ad hoc Committee <br /> met during May—June, 2003. This report summarizes the conclusions and <br /> recommendations of the ad hoc Finance Advisory Committee. <br /> B. Background: <br /> Summary points relative to why ISD#282 faces financial challenges: <br /> 1. From 1991-1992 school year to the 2002-2003 school year,public school districts <br /> have received, on average, a 2.5%annual increase in basic foundation aid. <br /> 2. There will be no increase in basic foundation aid for the 2003-2004 and 2004- <br /> 2005 school years. <br /> 3. Historically, ISD#282's average annual increase in expenditures is 6-7%. <br /> 4. The gap between revenue and expenditures is the primary cause of ISD#282's <br /> financial difficulty. <br /> 5. There has been an increasing number of un-funded or under funded state and <br /> federal mandates particularly over the past ten years. In fact the 2003 legislative <br /> session ended with additional un-funded mandates thrown at ISD#282. <br /> 6. ISD#282 is hugely under-funded relative to the maintenance and retrofit demands <br /> • of its facilities and there is no legal way to build up a reserve over time for <br /> facilities. <br /> Observations concerning Financial Management of ISD#282: <br /> 1. The school board has been prudent managers of the budget. <br /> 2. There have been ongoing annual budget reductions. <br /> 3. Revenue has been increased through accepting open-enrollment students and the <br /> revenue received has exceeded any additional expenses the district may have <br /> incurred because of additional students. However,the student capacity-limit has <br /> nearly been reached so this will not be a part of the solution for future budgets. <br /> 4. Some additional revenue has been received through a court ordered desegregation <br /> program. However,this is a year-by-year situation and is not revenue that should <br /> automatically be counted on. <br /> C. Process: <br /> The ad hoc committee reviewed materials and data concerning school district <br /> demographic trends, developments in educational processes, history and <br /> developments in ISD 282 finances,historical budgets and future budget <br /> projections,property tax levy history and projections, school district funding <br /> limits, and potential funding options including the various operating,capital <br /> project,and bond levy possibilities. The resources reviewed included,inter alia, <br /> the results of various studies by school administrators and independent <br /> consultants, and the participation of a representative of Springsted, a group <br /> specializing in techniques of funding local government. <br />