Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> Approximately 150 interested residents responded to the notice of the hearing <br /> • which was mailed in accordance with the law and the following views or opinions <br /> on the making of said improvements and on the levy of assessments to pay the <br /> cost thereof were stated as follows: <br /> Don Harkcom, 3001 36th Avenue N.F. wanted to know the approximate individual <br /> assessment per front foot which would result from the improvements and also <br /> whether maintenance estimates had been considered before the proposed improvements <br /> were considered. <br /> Tony Jambour, 3200 36th Avenue N.F. wanted "The city to leave his street alone". <br /> P.A. Bernard, 3201 36th Avenue N.F. expressed displeasure with the slides saying <br /> they accentuated the flaws in the street beyond their true condition and requested <br /> a definite per foot cost for the improvements. <br /> Gerald Dunphy, 3104 36th Avenue N.E. presented a petition signed by members of 36 <br /> households on his street and said 33 of these had indicated that "they don't want <br /> blacktop because it will make a race track of 36th Avenue". He later reiterated <br /> that the "people don't want the street". <br /> Mike Lamey, 3008 36th Avenue N.F. said he didn't want the whole street torn up. <br /> Roger Kittelson, 3309 36th Avenue N.E. said he had lived on the street for 12 years <br /> and last year was the first year the Maintenance Department had patched the holes <br /> and he felt there should be a special Maintenance Fund established whereby the <br /> • assessments could be prorated to all city residents. He also asked for the ex- <br /> pected life time of the proposed improvements. <br /> Robert Pulscher, 3524 Skycroft Drive and Stephen Callaghan, 3523 Skycroft Drive, <br /> both wanted to know how rapidly the roads might deteriorate and what the likeli- <br /> hood of complete deterioration would be if the improvements were not made. <br /> C.W. Kirk, 3612 Penrod Lane, stated that his street is only 15 years old and <br /> questioned whether it should have lasted longer, attributing the damage to the <br /> road bed to the rerouting of traffic from Silver Lake Road. He stated that <br /> "the improvements did not result from a demand of the citizens" and his inference <br /> was that the proposal was "make work" for the engineering company. He also <br /> questioned why the project was considered in a time of inflation. <br /> During the discussions with these residents Mr. Comstock said he was unable at <br /> that moment to give exact assessment figures until he knew which parcels of land <br /> would be assessed by the Council and pointed out that an increase in the last <br /> few years in the cost of building materials of over 50% made exact estimates very <br /> difficult. He also said the Maintenance Department is unable to do an adequate <br /> job of filling cracks in the road because they do not have the sophisticated <br /> equipment necessary for the job and the cost of such equipment for one community <br /> is prohibitive. <br /> Mayor Miedtke told the residents that the Council had been advised by the Mainten- <br /> ance Department of the deteriorating street surfaces and that the engineer had <br /> prepared the Preliminary Report on the improvements at the direction of the Council. <br /> • He also said in replacing the roads if they deteriorated completely the cost of <br /> concrete could run as high as $37.00 a front foot. It was also his belief that <br /> the Council had evaluated all the alternatives before proposing the improvements. <br />