My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 01231979
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1979
>
CC MINUTES 01231979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:18:55 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:18:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
36
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1979
SP Name
CC MINUTES 01231979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Council approval followed the guidelines suggested by the City Attorney. <br /> Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Sundland to grant <br /> all variances necessary to the lot split for the residence requested by <br /> Elmer Hansen for Lot 1, Block 1 Olsens Addition, subject to all easements <br /> as well as the granting to the City by Mr. Hansen of a 15 foot snow storage <br /> easement on that portion of the newly created Lot 2 which has been vacated <br /> by the City for the project and the relocation of the existing utility <br /> pole; minding that, (as did the Planning Board) (1) neither the lot size nor <br /> side yard width which will result from these variances will interfere with <br /> any adjoining dwellings, (2) the resultant front yard will be consistent <br /> with other residences on that cul-de-sac, (3) the backyard boundary line <br /> is governed by the shoreline of Silver Lake where property lines extend <br /> beyond dry land, (4) all conditions required for granting such variances <br /> have been met because (a) this particular property is somewhat unique as <br /> distinguished from the surrounding lots; (b) a hardship might be suffered <br /> by Mr. Hansen if the variances were not granted and, (c) the sole purpose <br /> for such variances is not monetary gain for Mr. Hansen. Preliminary plat <br /> approval was also given. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> The Board representative then reiterated the difficulties experienced by <br /> Richard Baer in his attempt to utilize for 12 ,000 square feet of the space <br /> which was previously used for Disco Skate. He reported the Board had in- <br /> dicated general approval of the concept of the teen center provided Mr. <br /> • Baer is able to demonstrate such an activity is permissible under a 1923 <br /> State Statute 624 . 42 which several Attorney General opinions find is still <br /> enforceable. Representative Steve Novac had come to discuss current legis- <br /> lation with the Council and answered questions directed to him by Mr. Baer <br /> regarding the viability of the 56 year old law which seems to prohibit <br /> attendance at any public dance by most teenagers which to Mr. Baer seemed <br /> very "discriminating" since this age group are allowed at almost any other <br /> function where liquor is not served. <br /> The Legislator said from a practical standpoint the statute should not be <br /> a problem but agreed with Mr. Soth that it might be preferable to try to <br /> have the law changed rather than to ignore it which could leave the City in <br /> a vulnerable position as to liability. He might be willing to sponsor <br /> legislation which would remove the law from the books but Representative <br /> Novac did not anticipate this could be done much before the end of March. <br /> The Mayor told Mr. Baer the City will not make any change in the City <br /> ordinance until the question is cleared up. <br /> Mr. Sauer arrived at 8: 00 p.m. <br /> Mrs. Kenneth Johnson, appearing for her husband- who operates the Burger <br /> Chef, 4004 Silver Lake Road, joined in the discussion of the request vari- <br /> ance to the City Sign Ordinance which will permit her husband to substitute <br /> for the existing signage on the restaurant the franchise's new logo which, <br /> though it would be smaller, will still not bring the sign into conformance <br /> with the ordinance. Mrs . Johnson questioned that portion of the Board <br /> minutes which referred to the "drive thru" sign saying there is no such sign <br /> on the driveway. <br /> (2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.