Laserfiche WebLink
� 1 <br /> CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> June 12 , 1979 <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7: 32 p.m. by Mayor Haik. <br /> Present for roll call : Sundland, Haik, Ranallo and Letourneau. <br /> Absent: Sauer. <br /> Also present: Jim Fornell, City Manager <br /> Dennis Buratti , City Attorney <br /> Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant <br /> Carol Johnson, Clerk/Treasurer <br /> Larry Hamer, Director of Public Works <br /> Skip McCombs and Alvin Schendel , McCombs-Knutson <br /> Motion by Councilman Sundland and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to <br /> approve as submitted the minutes for the Council 's May 22 , 1979 <br /> meeting. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> The following corrections were made to the minutes for the public <br /> hearing and special Council meeting, held May 30 , 1979 : <br /> • Page 5, Para 4 : Insert "only" between "disappointed to <br /> see. . . " and "the northern sections" <br /> in line 1; and change "33rd Avenue N.E. <br /> and Coolidge Street N.E. " to "35th and <br /> Coolidge and east of Silver Lake Road <br /> on 36th Avenue N.E. " in line 7 . <br /> Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Mayor Haik to approve as <br /> corrected the minutes for the Council ' s public hearing and special <br /> meeting held May 30 , 1979 . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by Mayor Haik and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to approve <br /> as submitted the minutes for the Board of Review held May 30, 1979 . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> The Mayor then reconvened the Board of Review at 7: 37 p.m. <br /> R. O. Becken of the Hennepin County Assessor' s Office reported an <br /> on-site reappraisal had been made at the direction of the Council <br /> of the Leonard Toth residence at 2900 Roosevelt Street N.E. and a <br /> market comparison made of this residence and four homes in the same <br /> section of the City which were sold in April and May of 1978 which <br /> resulted in a recommendation from the County that the market valua- <br /> tion for taxing purposes be raised $800 from $44 , 200 to $45 ,000 . <br /> The County Assessor had opted for utilizing the "cost appraisal" <br /> in this instance rather than the "market appraisal" which could have <br /> resulted in a raise to $46 , 300 . <br />