My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 04261988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 04261988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:17:36 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:17:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
35
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1988
SP Name
CC MINUTES 04261988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 awarded during the Council's May 24th meeting following the openin <br /> • 2 of the bids in the City Administrative offices on the 19th. <br /> 3 The City Manager said one of the key actions which must precede th <br /> 4 awarding of the bids would be Ramsey County allocating CDBG funds t <br /> 5 help St. Anthony to pay for the filtration system which was schedule <br /> 6 to be considered at the Ramsey County Board meeting just prior to th <br /> 7 Council meeting the 24th. <br /> 8 Bonding Considered Better Option Than Internal Borrowing for Temporar <br /> 9 Water Filtration System <br /> 10 The copy of the resolution in the agenda packet proposed interna <br /> 11 borrowing of $875,000 to cover the costs of a $450,000 temporary GA <br /> 12 system; $194,867 the City has already spent on attorneys' fees <br /> 13 consultants costs, etc. ; and $200,000 to pay costs anticipated t <br /> 14 accrue if the Army doesn't settle with St. Anthony for a couple o <br /> 15 years. Mr. Childs indicated that, since the resolution had bee <br /> 16 inserted in the agenda packet, he had followed Council instructions t <br /> 17 approach the City's financial consultant, Springsted, Inc. regarding a <br /> 18 alternative method of financing those costs. The consultants ha <br /> 19 provided spreadsheets for two different bond issues the Council migh <br /> 20 want to use rather than to deplete either the City's Special Assessmen <br /> 21 or Water Fund. <br /> 22 Mr. Childs detailed for the Council the approximate costs which th <br /> 23 City had incurred to date because of its water contamination problem <br /> 24 for which there had been no reimbursement covered: <br /> 25 *$23 ,000.00 the City had to pay for the Roseville water <br /> 26 connection; <br /> 27 *$42,500.00 in water payments to Roseville; <br /> 28 *$10,000.00 for extra monthly water testing; <br /> 29 *$12,000.00 initially paid to three engineering firms for pre- <br /> 30 liminary studies of the problem; <br /> 31 *$40,000.00 paid to date to Liesch and Associates for expert con <br /> 32 sulting services related to the City's lawsuit against the U.S. <br /> 33 Army et al in conjunction with the water contamination problems; <br /> 34 *$53 ,000.00 billings to date from Briggs and Morgan law firm who <br /> 35 are representing St. Anthony in that lawsuit. <br /> 36 In addition to other anticipated costs, Mr. Childs reminded the Counci <br /> 37 that after 10 years when the EPA no longer pays for maintaining th <br /> 38 system, the City would have to assume about $130,000.00 of thos <br /> 39 annual costs forever, or until the contamination ceases. As <br /> 40 contrast, the City Manager told the Councilmembers he understood Ne <br /> 41 Brighton had already spent over $800,000 in consulting and attorney' <br /> 42 fees in conjunction with their own water contamination problems. <br /> 43 The financial consultant had provided information on two bondin <br /> 44 options to finance the costs. The first was a General Obligation issu <br /> 45 which although it pushed the City's first principal payment as fa <br /> • 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.