Laserfiche WebLink
I Valek stated that he was present this evening to discuss four points: additional <br /> information that they have acquired relative to the odor problem at Essenco, the action <br /> 46 that the city is planning to pursue in response to the misrepresentation that Essenco used <br /> 4 in order to acquire their conditional use permit, a response to Doug Tanner's comments <br /> 5 from the January 22, 2002 City Council meeting, and the idea of Essenco wanting to <br /> 6 make their presence more permanent. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Valek stated that the information that he would be reviewing this evening was attained by <br /> 9 himself, his wife,Jennifer Tanner, and her father, Doug Tanner. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Valek indicated that they contacted a leasing agent with United properties,who lease the <br /> 12 property where Home Essence was located in St. Paul. He indicated that they received <br /> 13 several complaints from tenants about the odors caused by Home Essence. He added that <br /> 14 they were having trouble getting new tenants to move in due to the strong odor. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Valek continued that the Glincher Group, the property owners, finally made a deal with <br /> 17 Home Essence to move simply because they wanted them out of the building. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Valek referred to an interview with Ronald Paites, who manages property for the <br /> 20 Glincher Group. Paites indicated that they had a major problem with Home Essence due <br /> 21 to odors, and complaints from other tenants in the building. Valek indicated that they <br /> 22 were going to pursue legal action against Home Essence of they did not vacate the <br /> 23 property. Valek indicated that the Glincher Group lost a lot of money just to get Home <br /> 24 Essence out of the building. <br /> VValek reviewed an interview with an employee at Ramsey Family Physicians,a company <br /> 27 located in the same building as Home Essence in St. Paul, and affected by the odors. The <br /> 28 employee stated that the odor was overwhelming inside and outside of the building, and <br /> 29 that they received several complaints from patients. He indicted that one Ramsey Family <br /> 30 Physicians employee went over to Home Essence manufacturing floor to complain about <br /> 31 the odor and made a phone call to call OSHA after visiting the floor because the fumes <br /> 32 were so intense, she was concerned about the workers. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Valek stated that the Glincher Group agreed to replace all of the carpet,wall-paper, <br /> 35 ceiling tiles, as well as repaint the space. The costs to the Glincher Group was $32,000. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Valek requested a response from the City Council regarding the misrepresentation that <br /> 38 Home Essence made in order to obtain their conditional use permit, as well as Doug <br /> 39 Tanner's comments from the January 22, 2002 City Council meeting. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Valek stated that the felt that the information that they have obtained is damaging to <br /> 42 Essenco, and feels that he cannot trust them. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Councilmember Horst asked what grounds the Glincher Group was going to take legal <br /> 45 action against Home Essence. Valek indicated that Tanner had that information, but that <br /> 46 the Glincher Group was willing to share the information, if they were contacted. <br /> q? Resident Carol Patrick, 3633 Edward Street Northeast, stated she was concerned about <br /> 49 the season to come where windows will be open and time will be spent outside. She <br />