My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 03122002
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2002
>
CC MINUTES 03122002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:00:55 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:00:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
34
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 2002
SP Name
CC MINUTES 03122002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 <br /> March 12, 2002 <br /> Page 5 <br /> •1 <br /> 2 Kost indicated that the park is not only on a former landfill,but also a wetland. She <br /> 3 stated that the foundations were originally done for soil that was not damaged, and that <br /> 4 the costs incurred were significant. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Councilmember Faust asked about soft soil, and the impact of it on the building. Kost <br /> 7 stated that it would affect the building. Olivier indicated that, after the second round of <br /> 8 soil borings, they discovered that there is peat 10 feet down, which needs to be removed <br /> 9 or the foundations will be horrible. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Councilmember Faust asked about a contingency plan. Olivier indicated that there is no <br /> 12 contingency built into the$453,096.90. Forsbrook, SEH, stated that the figure is <br /> 13 complete, including excavation, and soil corrections. However,he added, it is unlikely <br /> 14 that other unforeseen costs will not be incurred,which is why they recommend that there <br /> 15 is some type of contingency built into the plan. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Councilmember Faust asked about the contaminated soil. Kost indicated that there is <br /> 18 both contaminated soil, and soft soil. The contaminated soil has chemicals in it that are a <br /> 19 by-product of what used to be in the area sixty years ago. Kost indicated that the peat, or <br /> 20 soft soil, was found very inconsistently throughout the soil. <br /> 21 <br /> Councilmember Thuesen asked if it was more likely to have cost overrun issues with the <br /> 41 soil versus the building itself. Kost indicated that the bid on the building is a fixed price. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Councilmember Horst stated that they were discussing two different things: the soil and <br /> 27 the building. He indicated that the overall project has$178,000 in environmental costs <br /> 28 alone. He continued that the price is continuing to climb, and the project is becoming a <br /> 29 black-hole project. He added that he hoped that consultants would help them out of these <br /> 30 problems,rather than get them into them. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Roger Larson came forward to review the designated funding with the Council. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Larson indicated that$2,300,000 has been approved,but that additional funding is <br /> 35 necessary. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Councilmember Horst asked Larson to clarify the suggested additional funding options. <br /> 38 Larson indicated that the$51,300 from 2001 liquor profits was considered an appropriate <br /> 39 use, and that the$293,800 in Apache LGA reserves was really the end of the money. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Mayor Hodson clarified that what they are asking for would not jeopardize the City's <br /> 42 credit rating. Larson stated that it was his opinion that their credit rating would remain <br /> 43 the same. <br /> 49 Councilmember Sparks confirmed that the contingency plan may, or may not,be used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.