My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 05201975
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agendas
>
2014
>
1975
>
PL MINUTES 05201975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:38:41 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
36
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1975
SP Name
PL MINUTES 05201975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> i FIANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> May 20, 1975 <br /> The meeting was called to order by Chairman Letourneau at 7:35 P.M. <br /> • The following were present for roll call: Rymarchick, Johnson, Cowan, Marks, <br /> Letourneau, Bowerman and Johnson. <br /> Also present: Jim Fornell <br /> Harry Lekson <br /> The minutes of the April 15, 1975 meeting were amended as follows: <br /> Page 1, para. 3: Substitute "May 13" for "May 15" as date of <br /> Public Hearing. <br /> Page 3, para. 5: Substitute "variances had to be considered" <br /> for "variances had to be granted". <br /> Motion by Mr. Marks, seconded by Mr. Bowerman to approve the April 15th minutes <br /> as amended. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> /Mr. Tom Healy of the Robert W. Johnson Law Firm, 2222 Selby Avenue, St. Paul, <br /> appeared to present the request from Goodyear Tire Company that they be allowed <br /> to erect a 96 sq. ft. each side free standing pylon sign in front of their store <br /> at 4020 Silver Lake Road. He stated the company was experiencing "great <br /> difficulty and hardship" because of lack of proper identification of the business <br /> • and as a result had lost from 50% to 55% of the sales volume they felt they <br /> should have had for that store in that location. He also said it would be <br /> necessary for Goodyear to increase their sales in that amount to stay in <br /> business. <br /> Mr. Healy was unable to provide Mr. Bowerman with the marketing studies he re- <br /> quested to support this contention nor to give particulars of the advertising <br /> or other efforts made by Goodyear to raise their sales volume. <br /> Mr. Johnson said Goodyear would have to prove the absence of a pylon sign worked <br /> a particular hardship on the company and suggested a monumental type sign might <br /> provide the identification the company needed. He said he personally might be <br /> interested in seeing a smaller, lower sign for that location and suggested the <br /> company consult members of the City staff for guidance on what might be accept- <br /> able. <br /> ccept- <br /> able. <br /> Mr. Cowan said he felt it a bad marketing decision by Goodyear to place their <br /> store so far back off Silver Lake Road and it was his opinion that the request <br /> did not meet the criteria set by ordinance for granting such a variance. <br /> In further discussion it was also pointed out that the City had refused the <br /> Firestone Company request to place a pylon sign in front of their store on <br /> Stinson Blvd. as well as other recent requests for similar signs. The fact that <br /> the Goodyear Company was refused such a sign at the time they were given per- <br /> mission to erect the store was also noted. <br /> • <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.