Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Marks and Mr. Rymarchick said they were agreement with the objections to the <br /> proposal which had been voiced by the residents of the neighborhood and felt the <br /> inherent activity of a restaurant made the proposal objectionable so near a residential <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Rymarchick also said he was not convinced that many of the potential restaurant <br /> customers would not choose Belden Drive or Coolidge Street to reach the restaurant <br /> in preference to fighting the traffic at the intersection of Silver Lake Road and <br /> 37th Avenue. <br /> Mr. Fornell also suggested Mr. Ernest to contact Ramsey County to ascertain whether <br /> they and any plans for channelization of the traffic down 37th Avenue which might <br /> interfere with his plans. <br /> Motion by Rymarchick and seconded by Mr. Bowerman to reconvene the Public Hearing on <br /> the Ernest proposal at the October 23, 1975 Board meeting and to waive further payment <br /> of fees since most of the expenses had been incurred and paid for with the first public <br /> hearing. <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Rymarchick, Cowan, Marks, Hiebel and Cowan <br /> Nay: Johnson <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mr�-•Rymarchick and Mr. Bowerman, who had been delegated the investigation of a possible <br /> violation of the Board's intent in the manner in which the sign had been erected in <br /> front of the Herfurth Realty Company, recommended no further Board action because the <br /> sign is now visually acceptable following the elevation of the grade of Silver Lake <br /> Road in front of the property and the landscaping around the sign being done in an <br /> acceptable manner. <br /> Mr. Rymarchick said he did feel that in any future instance where a sign variance is <br /> requested in an area where regrading is anticipated, the sign should be erected after <br /> the grade is established. <br /> Mr. Clarence W. Gould, 1295 Oakcrest, Roseville, appeared to present his request for <br /> 1 a building permit to erect a steel warehouse designed primarily for storage but <br /> occasionally for repair of pipe organ parts on Lot 3, Block 1 , Henkel Addition. The <br /> lot which is 75 feet wide and 135 feet long is owned by Mr. & Mrs. Harold Henkel <br /> who appeared to support the request. <br /> Mr. Gould presented a colored brochure from the Lester Company portraying a prototype <br /> of the proposed building. The applicant said he was trying to find out whether a <br /> steel building would be acceptable since the cost of a masonry building would be <br /> prohibitive. He said his business would require a minimum of parking spaces since <br /> there was no customer traffic anticipated and there would only occasionally be 2 <br /> or 3 cars at the site. <br /> Mr. Johnson said he was personally acquainted with Mr. Gould's business which involved <br /> Moeller organs but he advised Mr. Bould that the Board would find it difficult to <br /> arrive at a decision without more specific data on his plans for parking, curb cuts <br /> and landscaping. It was Mr. Johnson's feeling however that a precedent for granting <br /> the request had been established with the Donatelle Machine Shop, the millwork shop <br /> and Happy's close by and he said it was his belief that the proposal would provide <br /> a reasonable usage of the land especially because of its low traffic generation. <br />