PL MINUTES 03151977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• 1. The proposed use is more compatible to the residential uses in the area. 2. The City can use the additional dwellings . There is a possibility that the school district will gain a few new students. 3. At one point in time, the land was to be zoned for apartments. Mr. Rymarchick then offered a fourth condition, which was accepted by Mr. Cowan: 4 . That there be no change in the zoning of the parcels presently zoned light industrial that were the concern of Mr. Olson, Mr. Blanske and Mr. Henkel. Before the motion was seconded, Mr. Marks again suggested that the re- zoning be contingent upon a review of a site plan and building plans . Mr. Hiebel felt that the use was adequately controlled by the zoning ordinance. Mr. Letourneau expressed general support for rezoning to R-4 but also wanted to see a formal site plan. • Mr. Cowan felt that the use (apartments) is specific, not like rezoning a parcel to commercial and not knowing what the actual commercial use would be. Mr. Fudali stated he could not accept rezoning contingent upon an ac- ceptable site plan. He must know whether or not he can proceed and felt that adequate controls exist under existing building codes, mort- gager' s requirements, a final site plan review and the City zoning ordinance. Mr. Olson expressed his displeasure with the metal building across from his property and hoped that the development, if approved, would be a good one. Mr. Fornell mentioned the controls that exist under the newly adopted zoning ordinance which controls density, apartment size, setbacks , height, parking and landscaping. Mr. Rymarchick then seconded Mr. Cowan' s motion to approve the rezoning. Motion to recommend rezoning of Lots 17 and 18, Block 12, Mounds View Acres Second Addition to R-4 to the City Council carried unanimously. - The Board adjourned for ten minutes and then resumed the agenda with Mr. Chuck Bartlett's request for concept approval of a self service • (3)