Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br /> Each Board member indicated which approach he would favor if the <br /> • concept were to be adopted by the City , and expressed their concerns <br /> with the inherent problems of dual ownership of one structure , viewing <br /> a homeowners association as the best remedy. They also indicated a <br /> desire to retain control over the location where these concepts might <br /> be developed and questioned whether any existing two-family dwelling <br /> could be converted to the new usage. Mr . Jones was specifically <br /> opposed to the zero lot line concept favoring instead a common area <br /> controlled by a home owners association which could arbitrate dif- <br /> ferences . <br /> Motion by Mr. Bjorklund and seconded by Mr. Rymarchick to recommend <br /> to the City Council that the City staff, in conjunction with the <br /> City Attorney, be directed to draft the guidelines for the conditions , <br /> including a homeowners association, which must be met to allow con- <br /> dominium ownership in a R-2 (residential two-family dwelling) district <br /> under special use permit and that these guidelines be presented for <br /> Planning Board review and recommendations . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Klick left the meeting at 10 : 10 p.m. <br /> Mr. Fornell commented on his May 11 memorandum informing the Board <br /> of the request from John Penne for his concept review of possible <br /> service office development for the existing residential structure <br /> on the Hedlund property . No one from the Penne Realty firm appeared <br /> • to discuss the request. <br /> Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded by Mr. Rymarchick to table the <br /> request from Penne Realty until such time as a representative of <br /> that firm appears before the Board to provide additional information <br /> as to how the property in question is to be utilized. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Council action at their last meeting regarding the request from the <br /> M & M Development Corporation that the City allow road access and <br /> provide storm sewer service for the warehouse they propose to build <br /> on Roseville property off Anthony Lane, was reported by the Manager . <br /> The Board agreed with him that City staff should attempt to get <br /> more specific information from Roseville as to how they propose to <br /> service this and other undeveloped property adjacent to Anthony Lane. <br /> Mr. Bjorklund expressed his concern as to what extent Board members <br /> are governed by the Open Meeting-Law, and the Manager will research <br /> the matter with the City Attorney. <br /> Bill Weber, of B.R.W. , Inc. , discussed with the Board members specific <br /> changes they were suggesting in the material for the City ' s Compre- <br /> hensive Plan he had provided. It was suggested that each Board member <br /> should indicate his own suggestions in writing on the copies , for <br /> • submission within a week to Mr. Weber, for incorporation into the <br /> final draft which will be presented for their consideration. I': <br /> was agreed that a separate work session would probably be neces.;ary <br /> and May 21 was the date tentatively set for the session . <br />