Laserfiche WebLink
-6- <br /> Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded by Mr. Enrooth to recommend to <br /> the Council that E of VI , Scheduling Component, be construed to <br /> permit Mr. Hedlund to be the first B tenant occupant of the <br /> building. <br /> Voting on the motion : <br /> Aye: Marks, Jones, Enrooth <br /> Nay : Rymarchick, Sopcinski <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mr Hedlund and Mr. Haggerty indicated their concurrence with the <br /> terms of the Concept Plan as now negotiated "at least in respect <br /> to the first building" . <br /> Upon determining the submission for the Detailed Plan was adequate <br /> for a Public Hearing , it was suggested Mr. Hedlund should incorporate <br /> the site plans with the landscaping plans to show the residents how <br /> the first building will be positioned in relation to the rest of <br /> the site and there should also be clear indication of how traffic <br /> will be circulated through the area and parking provided. He was <br /> also urged to provide photographs and specifications of the first <br /> building he proposes to build. <br /> Motion by Mr. Marks and seconded by Mr. Jones to recommend to the <br /> Council that the Planning Board hold a Public Hearing during their <br /> September 18 meeting for the purpose of getting public reaction <br /> to the Detailed Plan of the Hedlund PUD, contingent upon Council 's <br /> acceptance of the recommendations made by the Planning Board in <br /> respect to the submission requirements for the Plan. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Soth left at 11 : 25 p.m. <br /> Board members made several suggestions regarding the Comprehensive <br /> Plan being developed by Minneapolis to be passed on by City Staff. <br /> This included suggestions regarding the proliferation of commercial <br /> and encr,uragemcnt of a hike path alcng Stinson Boulevard. <br /> Mr. Rymarchick left at 11: 35 p.m. <br /> The next work session on the City ' s Comprehensive Plan is scheduled <br /> for 7 : 30 p.m. , September 4 . Action was deffered to a future meeting <br /> when the agenda is shorter on the proposed parking requirements for <br /> sit-down restaurants and revisions of the City Sign Ordinance. The <br /> seminars on perking, environmental law, and of the State Planning <br /> Agency were noted. <br /> g Y <br /> Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded by Mr. Sopcinski to adjourn the <br /> meeting at 11: 50 p.m. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Helen Crowe, Board Secretary <br />