PL MINUTES 06192001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes • June 19, 2001 Page 10 1 -68 units—Townhouses (30 foot wide units, two story) 2 -100 units—Senior High Rise 3 -330 units—4 story multiple dwellings 4 -340 units —3 story multiple dwellings 5 -Total: 850 units 6 75,000 square feet of mixed commercial 7 100,000 square feet of office 8 Mr. Basil stated that the two alternatives that he presented are, in a general sense, the type of 9 thing that they are going to end up with if they proceed with the redevelopment of the mall. 10 Mr. Basil indicated that a lot of what had been presented was driven by was what the community 11 has requested, as well as external factors, what the market has to offer, and what is feasible. 12 Commissioner Hanson asked if they had an idea how much quicker the total bill-out could be if 13 they had a Corporate Campus versus if it was all housing. Mr. Basil indicated that the housing 14 option could happen relatively quickly because of the variation in the types housing. He added 15 that the Corporate Campus would happen in one of two chunks at a time. Jim Prosser, Ehlers and Associates, stated that he was there to discuss how the concept and 17 framework would get them to the end of the Redevelopment of the Northwest Quadrant. 18 The framework elements that would be approved by the City would be used to solicit proposals 19 from developers. He indicated that they may have several different concepts to explore 20 simultaneously, which provides the City with better options. 21 Mr. Prosser stated that the development proposals that they receive are not plans. Rather, they 22 encourage developers to define a cite-line, as opposed to an elevation and line detail. 23 Mr. Prosser stated that the Planners will use the general cite plan to evaluate and provide the city 24 feedback regarding the impact that the various proposals would have on the city with reference to 25 the framework elements that have been identified by the City. 26 Mr. Prosser stated they would provide the City with an evaluation that considers the financial 27 feasibility. He stated that they would look at the cost to acquire the land (including demolition 28 and relocation), as well as any public improvements required to accomplish that particular type 29 of development. 30 Mr. Prosser indicated that they want to select a developer that appears to capture a concept that is 31 feasible, as well as one that is most responsive to the framework elements that the City has •32 identified. 33 Mr. Prosser indicated that the City of St. Anthony would likely be looking at multiple developers 34 to develop the selective pieces. He added that they want to see this billed out as quickly as they