My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 12182001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
2001
>
PL MINUTES 12182001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:38:11 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:38:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
36
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 2001
SP Name
PL MINUTES 12182001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> December 18, 2001 <br /> • Page 7 <br /> 1 Chair Melsha responded that, if they did the trial, it would need to be the most objective <br /> 2 criteria as possible to determine whether the conditions of the trial are being met. Chair <br /> 3 Melsha suggested that they add the charcoal filters now. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Vice Chair Stille asked what the criteria was in order for the Commission to deny a <br /> 6 conditional use permit. Chris Smith, City Attorney, stated that, in order to deny a <br /> 7 conditional use permit, it would depend upon the standards that they were to establish. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Chair Melsha stated that he understood that there was a fairly high standard regarding <br /> 10 health and safety. Smith stated that it was hard to quantify smell, and that perhaps the <br /> 11 Commission should require filters at this time. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Chair Melsha asked if a threat to personal welfare was grounds for denial of a conditional <br /> 14 use permit. Smith stated that it was. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Commissioner Thomas asked about the impact on property values. Smith stated that it <br /> 17 was difficult to quantify because of the injury that was being proposed. He stated that the <br /> 18 Commission and City Council could make a finding, based on the evidence that was <br /> 19 before them,that it would be detrimental to the property values. He added that if they <br /> 20 had evidence, such as personal testimonies of residents who live in the area and find the <br /> 21 odors offensive,then the finding would be upheld <br /> • 22 <br /> 23 Chair Melsha expressed his concern of taking a leap of faith. He added that he was <br /> 24 uncertain that a trial period would be a good option. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Vice Chair Stille stated that putting a time frame on a permit would find them at the same <br /> 27 place, at a later date. He added that he had a larger problem with the buildings that were <br /> 28 to be built across the railroad tracks. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Commissioner Hanson stated that he was uncomfortable with the fact that they illegally <br /> 31 began operations. In his mind, he believes that they have already proven that the <br /> 32 charcoal filters are necessary immediately. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Commissioner Steeves stated that they still had decisions to make regarding evaluation <br /> 35 regardless of how soon. He added that having a panel of independent citizens who have <br /> 36 no vested interest in the outcome was the only way that they could come to any fair <br /> 37 conclusion. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Commissioner Thomas stated that there are people who do work on odors at the <br /> 40 University of Minnesota. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Chair Melsha asked for Smith's opinion on what they are discussing. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Smith stated that, if they were to come up with an objective panel, it would be the best <br /> 45 way to protect the City from a lawsuit. He added that they might not want to limit the <br /> 46 condition to say no order, but perhaps no odor beyond a certain point. <br /> 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.