Laserfiche WebLink
r ' <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> October 15, 2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> expansion plans for 3015 37' Avenue Northeast. The final submitted site plan shows <br /> 2 demolition of four existing buildings and construction of a new 40,000 square feet <br /> 3 building. Notification has been sent to the property owners within 350 feet of the <br /> 4 proposed development. Mr. Murlowski of Belair Excavating is representing Business <br /> 5 Data Record Services for two variance requests: 1) A building height variance of 9 feet <br /> 6 for a proposed 44 feet building height; and 2) A side yard variance request of 35 feet <br /> 7 (along Macalester Drive) for a proposed 5 feet side yard adjacent to a street. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Ms. Hall advised that Mr. Murlowski met with the Planning Commission on August 20 <br /> 10 for a concept review of preliminary site plans. The applicants are now submitting their <br /> 11 final plans and are asking for two variances. First, a variance for building height of 44 <br /> 12 feet is proposed. According to City ordinance, maximum building height in a Light <br /> 13 Industrial zoning district is 35 feet, which makes this a variance request of 9 feet. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Ms. Hall indicated Fire Chief Joel Hewitt has reviewed the proposed plans and stated the <br /> 16 height will be all right because of the mutual aid agreement. A good example of what this <br /> 17 height will look like is at another nearby Business Data Record Services site at 200 Old <br /> 18 Highway 8 in New Brighton. That building stands 42 feet in height. The second <br /> 19 variance request is for the side yard setback. The side yard is considered Macalester <br /> 20 Drive. The applicants are requesting a side yard setback of 5 feet. City ordinance states a <br /> 21 side yard adjacent to a street must be at least 40 feet, which makes this a variance request <br /> of 35 feet. Although the proposed side yard setback won't make the building stick out <br /> any more than the existing building, it would be on the curb line. Public Works Director <br /> 24 Jay Hartman has reviewed the existing an proposed setbacks and said for snow removal <br /> 25 there will still be plenty of room in the right-of-way to stock pile snow. Still, he noted, <br /> 26 this is a substantial variance request. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Ms. Hall explained that per the applicants, the existing side yard setback at Macalester <br /> 29 Drive is 5 feet at the south building and 30 feet at the north building. The existing front <br /> 30 yard setback at 37`h (County Road D) is 20 feet, the existing side yard at the Xcel <br /> 31 substation varies from 2 feet to 0 feet. Finally, the existing rear yard setback at the <br /> 32 railroad varies from 3 feet to 1 foot, 6 inches. The property and easement lines are 50 feet <br /> 33 from the railroad centerline. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Ms. Hall stated the city engineer reviewed and approved the drainage plans. The runoff <br /> 36 from the site will go to a new water retention pond shown on the site plan. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Ms. Hall noted that parking is adequate at the site, per City ordinance, because this is a <br /> 39 warehousing facility which requires the facility must have at least one space per <br /> 40 employee on the largest shift plus one parking space per company vehicle. There are 40 <br /> 41 parking stalls shown on the site plan, which will be enough spots for employees per Mr. <br /> 42 Murlowski. <br /> 43 <br /> Mr. Murlowski, the applicant,reviewed his request with the Commission. He stated his <br /> 16 organization has done several improvements to this site in the past. Mr. Murlowski <br /> 46 distributed pictures of a building that is similar to what he is proposing for the Business <br /> 47 Dad Record Service Expansion. He then introduced Jim White as the project architect. <br />