My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 12172002
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
2002
>
PL MINUTES 12172002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:03:40 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:03:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
34
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 2002
SP Name
PL MINUTES 12172002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chair Stille asked if the four feet side yard setback was accurate. Mr. Bauske <br /> stated this should be a fairly accurate measurement as he did locate the stake. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Chair Melsha stated he would be in favor of locating the air conditioning unit in the <br /> 5 northeast corner of the lot and not the side yard, as this would reduce the setback <br /> 6 amount and would greater screen the unit. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Chair Melsha asked how long Mr. Bauske has lived in this home. Mr. Bauske stated <br /> 9 he has been in this home for 10 years. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Commissioner Steeves asked what type of land was to the north of his home. Mr. <br /> 12 Bauske stated his neighbor to the north has a deep lot and noted this land was an open <br /> 13 backyard. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Commissioner Tillman asked why the unit could not be placed on the west side of the <br /> 16 property. Mr. Bauske stated it would be preferable on the east side of the home <br /> 17 because it is closer to the furnace as suggested by the contractor. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Commissioner Hanson asked if this air conditioner would be replacing two window <br /> 20 units. Mr. Bauske stated this would be the case. He explained he recently installed <br /> 21 new windows and did not want to harm the windows integrity by placing the window <br /> 22 units in them next spring. <br /> 2 <br /> Chair Melsha closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. <br /> 2 <br /> 26 Commissioner Tillman asked Staff for rationale behind the 15-foot setback. Ms. Hall <br /> 27 noted she was not certain of the reasoning behind the 15-foot requirement, although <br /> 28 noise is probably part of the reason. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Vice Chair Stille stated he felt a home does need air conditioning, which could be <br /> 31 another condition to the hardship for this applicant. Chair Melsha agreed. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commissioner Thomas indicated he felt the ordinance could be revisited and that the <br /> 34 15-foot requirement was a bit much. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Chair Melsha noted he was not comfortable putting the unit on the east side of the <br /> 37 home by the window,but instead near the northeast corner. Commissioner Steeves <br /> 38 agreed stating the placement of the home on this lot is not optimal for locating an air <br /> 39 conditioning unit outside the home. He added that the northeast corner would be best <br /> 40 for neighboring properties as well. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Vice Chair Stille indicated the noise factor for the neighboring property to the east <br /> 43 should not be a concern, and added he would like to locate the unit in the northeast <br /> 44 corner of the property. <br /> 45 <br /> Commissioner Tillman stated she felt the unit could be located on the west side of the <br /> 4 home and added that she felt an air conditioner was not a necessity and did not create <br /> 48 a hardship on the applicant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.