My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05172005
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2005
>
PL PACKET 05172005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:23:50 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 05172005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feet of a residential zoning district. The conditions approved for this site in 2003 are listed below <br /> and pertained to a popular bar and grill that was interested in locating to this site: <br /> a. Garbage areas must be enclosed with materials that match buildings and must be located on <br /> the southwest corner. <br /> b. Lighting must be"down-spill",with no spillage to residential properties across Kenzie <br /> Terrace and conform to adjacent area (St. Anthony Boulevard). <br /> c. Hours for outdoor seating shall not exceed 10:00 p.m. <br /> d. No music or other artificial noise shall be audible from any residential district. <br /> e. City engineers must approve the plan,including a determination that the proposed plan will <br /> not have an adverse impact on the current water run-of situation. <br /> f. The patio will be on the east side of the building. <br /> g. Break up mass and improve the landscape to the north side of the building. <br /> h. The design of the building shall conform to the Savage store. <br /> i. Hours of operation shall coincide with liquor service hours. <br /> Because the current proposed tenant is not to be located in the out lot, some of the original <br /> conditions of the approved CUP may not be appropriate to the end cap location. For example, <br /> the restaurant will not have an outdoor seating area, the garbage area is enclosed within the <br /> building,no landscaping requirements, and the patio location would not apply. <br /> The proposed tenants have applied for a liquor license and are scheduled for Council review and <br /> approval at the May 24th City Council meeting. <br /> B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Drive-Thru Service-Out Lot. AMCON is proposing to construct a <br /> building on the Out Lot located at 2702 Highway 88 on the north end of the lot. One of the <br /> proposed tenants for this proposed building requires a drive-thru as part of their business. The <br /> City Ordinance at Section1635.03 (b) states this is a permitted use only with a Conditional Use <br /> Permit. <br /> C. VARIANCE PETITION- Building Setback-Out Lot. In revising the original site plan due to <br /> changes in proposed uses and the location of those uses, AMCON has presented a site plan that <br /> proposes a 4,500 SF building,which represents a reduction of the building footprint by 1,500 SF. <br /> This revised site plan also reduces the number of variances required for the construction of the <br /> building planned for the Out Lot. <br /> Originally, they required two variances as the northeast and northwest corners of the proposed <br /> building were in the building setbacks. The City Council granted those variances in 2003. <br /> Resolution 03-053,approved on July 15, 2003,identified the following findings of fact based on <br /> hardships that exist for this property: <br /> a. The property is currently blighted,poorly planned with regard to layout and is an overall <br /> detriment to the area. <br /> b. Undue hardship exists and is a result of an oddly shaped parcel that is generally triangular <br /> in shape with a rounded side. <br /> c. These circumstances are not caused by the applicant or property owner. <br /> d. The variance,if granted,would not alter the essential character of the locality,but would <br /> essentially replace existing blighted structures with new,more aesthetically pleasing <br /> buildings. <br /> e. The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the requested variance because even <br /> reconstructing the existing blighted buildings on their same footprints would require setback <br /> variances. <br /> H:\Planning\Staff Reports\2005\AMCON staff report 051705.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.