My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06212005
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2005
>
PL PACKET 06212005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:24:26 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 06212005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> May 17, 2005 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 the cemetery site and proposes a 10-acre minimum be added to the language. He stated that the <br /> 2 site itself consists of approximately 97 acres in St. Anthony and 20-acres in Minneapolis noting <br /> 3 that the concern is the changing of organic language in order to meet the limitations of the <br /> 4 acreage. He stated that they are also requesting that certain accessory uses be included as <br /> 5 permitted uses and that the ordinance be changed to include language that allows funeral home <br /> 6 mortuaries and crematorium as a permitted conditional use. He stated that the language changes, <br /> 7 proposed by Staff, are acceptable noting that they included the mortuary to be consistent with <br /> 8 other parts of the City's language. He explained that the crematorium is also a part of the <br /> 9 operation and services that a funeral home provides. He requested that any details be included <br /> 10 with the condition of use process. He reviewed the overall project noting that they have other <br /> 11 requests as they move forward through this process that includes the proposal to construct a new <br /> 12 structure on this site, which would be part of the conditional use process. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Mr. Tyson stated that they invited the public and City officials to an Open House this past <br /> 15 January noting that this was a good way for them to show the Residents what they would like to <br /> 16 do. He stated that site drawings were provided for their review and comment noting that they <br /> 17 received a lot of positive feedback and information. He stated that they have also held informal <br /> 18 meetings with City Staff to discuss the proposals and concern regarding the historic significance. <br /> 19 He stated that the City responded by hiring Charlene Roise to perform a study noting that the <br /> 20 study concluded that the building is functionally obsolete. He indicated that the report also states <br /> 21 that there was a case for removal of the building noting that individually they are not eligible for <br /> 22 the national register. He stated that this conclusion came after a very thorough study of the <br /> 23 building. He stated that they responded to the City's request to meet with the State Historical <br /> 24 Society noting that they hired Charles Nelson, former head of the State Historical Society, to <br /> 25 assist with the historical aspects of the property. He stated that John Herman is available this <br /> 26 evening to answer questions. He noted that the findings would also be part of the next public <br /> 27 hearing when they come forward to request approval for the conditional use permit. He <br /> 28 referenced the concerns expressed regarding potential encroachment of the design of the building <br /> 29 on existing gravesites and assured the Commission that he could state, without exception, that <br /> 30 this is not the case. He stated that Matt Duggan is present with drawings of the proposed site that <br /> 31 show this is not the case. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commissioner Young asked how they came up with the 10-acre figure. Mr. Tyson explained <br /> 34 that it was based on research from other municipalities and on the size of the City of St. Anthony. <br /> 35 Ms. Moore-Sykes further clarified noting that Staff also discussed the acreage. She explained <br /> 36 that there are other cemeteries located in the City and Staff did not want to create a non- <br /> 37 conforming situation. She assured the Commission that the other cemeteries would be included <br /> 38 in the acreage before proposing final approval. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Commissioner Jensen noted their proposal includes discussion of funeral homes and mortuaries <br /> 41 as non-conforming use and asked what the differences are between funeral homes and <br /> 42 mortuaries. Mr. Tyson explained that the term mortuaries and funeral homes are synonymous <br /> 43 terms for the same use. <br /> 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.