My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06212005
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2005
>
PL PACKET 06212005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:24:26 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 06212005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS <br /> Avoiding Di"Sputes <br /> Regulating the use of land has always been a tricky business. It involves a balancing act, <br /> taking into consideration the desire for a well-managed and well-planned community, <br /> while remaining cognizant of the high value people place on property rights. <br /> By Tom Grundhoefer <br /> of surprisingly,with land plan- regularly review those regulations to request,the final plat must be approved <br /> nirng efforts becoming more make sure they are consistent with cur- within 60 days if all conditions of pre- <br /> prevalent and sophisticated,and rent law,in areas such as:sign ordinance liminary approval have been met. <br /> private property rights awareness rulings,adult entertainment decisions, Every city should also be aware <br /> increasing,society has seen an telecommunications regulations,park of another statutory requirement: <br /> increase in the number of con- and road dedication rules,legislation Minnesota's"60-day rule"(Minn. <br /> flicts (lawsuits) arising out of dealing with nonconforming uses,state Stat.§ 15.99).Under this law,a city <br /> government land-use regulation. law voting requirements,and"60-day" must either approve or deny a written <br /> esota is no exception to this trend. requirements. request"relating to zoning"within <br /> By any measure of evaluation,land Cities should also review their regu- 60 days of the time it is submitted to <br /> use and development disputes represent lations to make sure they are consistent the city.The city may extend the time <br /> a significant impact on Minnesota cities. with past staff and council interpretations, period for an additional 60 days,but <br /> In fact,as a percentage of total claims, and to make sure they are consistent only if it does so in writing and before <br /> land-use litigation represents more than with the city's comprehensive plan. expiration of the initial 60-day period. <br /> 20 percent of all defense and indemnity Finally,and perhaps most importantly, As a general matter,any written request <br /> dollars paid out by the League of they should be reviewed to ensure con- related to zoning ought to be treated <br /> Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust sistency with the council's current goals as triggering the start of the 60-day <br /> (LMCIT).The chart on page 7 shows and visions for the community.Regula- period.This requirement makes it <br /> the number of land-use related lawsuits tions that are inconsistent with what vitally important that cities scrutinize <br /> that have been brought against LMCIT the council and staff see as the future of applications as they come in the door <br /> member cites.The chart shows both the community can only cause conflicts to fust make sure that all information is <br /> the number of claims,as well as the when the particular applications have to present,and then to process those appli- <br /> associated costs.Given these numbers, be evaluated. cations in an expeditious manner. <br /> land use is obviously a topic worthy Process requests in a timely manner. Comply with all published notice <br /> of attention. Council and staff should be mindful that requirements.State statute prescribes <br /> all land-use related applications must be explicit notice requirements for com- <br /> Suggestionsfor avoiding disputes acted upon in a timely manner.Most prehensive plan amendments,rezoning <br /> This article offers some practical ideas people understand that cities must have requests,and subdivision approvals. <br /> for cities to consider in trying to more a reasonable amount of time to consider Generally,the law requires 10 days <br /> effectively head-off potential land-use land-use requests.On the other hand, published notice of comprehensive <br /> challenges.While a certain number of they are less tolerant of a process that . plan,rezoning,and subdivision actions. <br /> disputes and lawsuits are inevitable,the unduly prolongs the approval time In most cases,the law also mandates <br /> following suggestions may be helpful process. 10 days mailed notice to those with <br /> in avoiding some of the disputes.Almost In addition to ordinance require- property located within 350 feet of land <br /> every one of the following suggestions ments that some cities may have,state that is being rezoned.Some cities may <br /> is generated out of some real life exam- law is clear in a number of different ar- also have unique ordinance or charter <br /> ple encountered by a Minnesota city. eas about the timeframe for processing provisions that specify particular notice <br /> Regularly review land-use controls. land-use approvals.For instance,state requirements. <br /> Statutes and court decisions directly law requires that a preliminary plat be Avoid making promises.City staff, <br /> affect the authority of cities to regulate either approved or denied within 120 councilmembers,and planning com- <br /> land.Any city that has adopted a zon- days of submission to the city.Follow- mission members should try to avoid <br /> nig and subdivision ordinance should ing preliminary plat approval,and upon making representations or promises <br /> 6 MINNESOTA CITIES OCTOBER 2 0 0 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.