Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> June 21, 2005 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 1 Chair Stromgren acknowledged noting that part of the rationale for the limitation on size is <br /> 2 having to do with the City not wanting a pole barn size building in the back that overpowers the <br /> 3 size of the house. He stated that the levels were set and the Commission has to abide by them <br /> 4 and ensure that the requests meet all three criteria. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Mr. Kaczmarczyk stated that technically to get up to the 35-foot range he would be willing to go <br /> 7 to a 40-foot by 24-foot size garage, 25-feet back. He expressed concerns stating that it would be <br /> 8 gaudy in appearance and out of the ordinary. He acknowledged it would still be smaller than his <br /> 9 house, he would have a long driveway and it would be 40-feet wide, which would be more gaudy <br /> 10 than a 30-foot by 26-foot. He stated that if he could get something within that range he would be <br /> 11 satisfied. He stated that he would be willing to redo and come back for review. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Chair Stromgren suggested that he work with Staff to make the changes and present them at the <br /> 14 Council level. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Vice Chair Hanson clarified that a chain link fence exists to the east and that there is only 8-feet <br /> 17 between the house and the fence. Mr. Kaczmarczyk confirmed and explained that he is five feet <br /> 18 away on the west side and with the 26-foot wide it would be 31-feet which is 2-feet into the <br /> 19 breezeway. He stated that he would have 24-feet between the breezeway and the side fence. He <br /> 20 stated that it is open now but with a garage in that area they would not be able to get a vehicle <br /> 21 through the area. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Commissioner Jensen stated that the 15-feet recognizes some of the health and safety <br /> 24 opportunities for the community by keeping it wide enough for a vehicle to get through noting <br /> 25 that the applicant could move the structure to be within five and not have to be here. He stated <br /> 26 that as a community they would have to give up the opportunity to be able to get a vehicle <br /> 27 through to the back if that is one of the few openings that presents itself for the next several <br /> 28 years. He stated that most of the houses built have 15-feet between them and not many trucks <br /> 29 could get through. He noted the code compliance stating that the Commission cannot change the <br /> 30 code. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Motion by Commissioner Jensen, second by Commissioner Galyon, to recommend denial of the <br /> 33 Rear Yard Variance Request for 2513 West Armour Terrace NE as applied, 26-foot by 30-foot <br /> 34 garage because there were no findings of undue hardship. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 37 <br /> 38 7.2 3645 Chelmsford Road NE—R-1 to R-3 Rezoning Request <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Chair Stromgren opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that staff has provided the Commission with a revised report for the <br /> 43 request to rezone at 3645 Chelmsford Road noting that the reason it was revised is because <br /> 44 Commissioner Jensen brought it to her attention that there could be some right-of-way issues <br /> 45 with this property because it is located adjacent to a county road and a city road near a corner lot. <br />