My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08162005
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2005
>
PL PACKET 08162005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:25:15 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:24:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 08162005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 19, 2005 <br /> Page 11 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Commissioner Jensen asked if this is an interpretation or do they specifically prohibit the egress. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Ms. Moore-Sykes referenced Section 1615, the regulation portion of Chapter 16 stating that an <br /> 5 egress is not listed as an allowable item within the ordinance and therefore is prohibited. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Ramona Steadman, 2909 30th Avenue Northeast stated that they just recently purchased a home <br /> 8 that has a den in the basement and they would like to install an egress window that would meet <br /> 9 safety regulations. She stated that the property sketch she has shows the house at five feet, plus <br /> 10 or minus. She stated that she and her husband tried to measure it was real close to five feet <br /> 11 adding that they are not sure without the certificate of survey, which would cost approximately <br /> 12 $700.00 to $1000.00,which is prohibitive for them to do. She explained that they have 62 feet <br /> 13 across and one side is just the five feet, which is the side where they want to install the egress <br /> 14 window. She stated that she was under the impression that the Commission would be discussing <br /> 15 items like this tonight noting that as far as the smaller lots with garages sometimes there is not <br /> 16 enough room to make these improvements to make the house better. She explained that the front <br /> 17 of their house has a stone front in addition to the gas line adding that they would have to move <br /> 18 the gas line and build the egress window up into the stone face of the house, which aesthetically <br /> 19 would not look as nice. She stated that this is why she is here and is hoping that this is <br /> 20 something that the Commission would address. She stated that she was not sure if she had to <br /> 21 have a certificate of survey and asked if this is a requirement. She asked if she is responsible for <br /> 22 talking to the neighbors and get their comments and would that be enough for them to get <br /> 23 approval. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Ms. Moore-Sykes explained that the problem with finding pins is that sometimes, over the years, <br /> 26 the pins end up moved or removed due to erosion and changes in the landscaping and <br /> 27 measurements taken may not show the true location of the property line. She further explained <br /> 28 that the certificate of survey would verify and document the true property line. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Ms Steadman asked if this is what is required for a fence adding that she does not understand <br /> 31 why locating the pin is ok for a fence and not a window well. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Chair Stromgren further explained that when a surveyor comes out to survey the property they <br /> 34 don't just locate the pin and they go back to know benchmarks such as fire hydrants and other <br /> 35 utilities located in the street that they know have not moved. He stated that a certificate of survey <br /> 36 is the only way that staff knows where the actual property lines are located. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that the certificate of survey is also a for the protection of the <br /> 39 homeowners. She explained that situations have occurred where improvements have encroached <br /> 40 onto a neighbors' property based on the pin that they thought was where it was supposed to be. <br /> 41 She stated that it could be a very expensive process adding that she would not want to see them <br /> 42 be in a situation where they would have to remove the improvements due to an encroachment. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Ms. Steadman asked if there is an allowance for a variance. She clarified for a stoop it would be <br /> 45 allowed but as far as a fence or egress it would require a variance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.