Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> Three scenarios for highways Growing the transit system <br /> The TPP's highway plan–developed in close coordination — The transit plan is <br /> with the Minnesota Department of Transportation–focuses ® o intended to increase <br /> investments on maintaining and managing the existing ridership by 50 percent, <br /> 657-mile highway system, removing bottlenecks and adding or 36 million riders per <br /> capacity where possible. year, by 2020–with the <br /> goal of doubling ridership by 2030. The <br /> How far and how fast the region can go in improving the =1 strategies for achieving the 2020 <br /> highway system hinges on the success of proposals to target include: <br /> r- <br /> increase federal and state funding. Because of the political <br /> uncertainties, the plan outlines three scenarios: ■Adding new express bus routes, i 1_'i <br /> limited-stop routes, improved frequency <br /> o Constrained Plan Scenario: Based on current funding levels, and longer hours of service, as well as <br /> this scenario estimates about $283.5 million a year will be available. additional passenger amenities such as <br /> Of this total, $162 million would be needed to maintain and manage transit centers, bus stop shelters and <br /> the current highway system.Another $29.5 million would be needed for park-and-ride lots. <br /> other purposes, leaving just $92 million for expansion projects. Based on F <br /> current cost estimates, the region would be able to build by 2030 only °Funding enhancements such asr <br /> those expansion projects previously planned for construction by 2025. bus-only shoulders, ramp-meter bypasses <br /> and signal priority that give buses cv <br /> ® Unconstrained Plan Scenario: This scenario illustrates the travel-time advantages in mixed traffic. <br /> magnitude of highway investments required to hold congestion on the °Providing additional fare incentives ` <br /> metropolitan highway system at the same level that existed in 1998. Its such as the MetroPass now available <br /> implementation would require about a 425 percent increase in highway through employers and the U-Pass avail- <br /> funding over the current levels, admittedly an unlikely prospect. able to University of Minnesota students. ° <br /> ■Developing a network of dedicated <br /> ® Constrained Plus 30% Plan Scenario: This scenario assumes a 30 "transitways" –including bus rapid <br /> percent increase in highway funding over the Constrained Plan Scenario. transit, light rail and/or commuter rail– <br /> Of the $368.5 million in annual resources, nearly$200 million would be with mode choices based on a usercarerail <br /> available for expansion projects.This scenario would accelerate by 10 years cost-benefit analysis.The region now has <br /> the improvements planned by 2030 under the Constrained Plan scenario. cost-benefit <br /> such t analysis. <br /> nsitways: bus rapid transit <br /> In addition, it would provide funds to expand the entire I-494/694 beltway on Isuc and LRT in the Hiawathait <br /> to six lanes, and expand and upgrade <br /> certain minor arterials. cor- <br /> ridor. Five additional transitways should <br /> be added between 2005 and 2020, with <br /> work done to advance three more. <br /> The cost of implementing the transit <br /> plan: $500 million in capital investments <br /> to grow the bus system and $800 million <br /> to $1.4 billion to build the transitways, <br /> _ with an additional$120 million a year <br /> for operating costs by 2020. <br />