My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02212006
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2006
>
PL PACKET 02212006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:26:49 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:26:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 02212006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> January 17,2006 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 two-story elevation noting that the office space located on the first floor and lower level would <br /> 2 be enhanced with windows. He stated that the building has a typical floor plan noting that the <br /> 3 plan shows four units with a stairway to the lower level, which is where the mechanical room <br /> 4 would be located. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Mr. Mohagen indicated that they have done similar buildings throughout the metro area noting <br /> 7 that the parking for this type of building has typically been seven to ten spaces per unit. He <br /> 8 explained that they use a net square footage calculation to determine the parking needs noting <br /> 9 that his calculations show 9,600 square feet with 38 parking stalls, which is within the realm of <br /> 10 the current parking requirements. He stated that it is their belief that this project would be well <br /> 11 suited for this site. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Commissioner Young asked if they are looking at the potential of up to eight possible tenants or <br /> 14 could the areas be expanded to accommodate two or three tenants with employees. Mr. <br /> 15 Mohagen stated that it would be tight but they could have up to eight tenants. He stated that the <br /> 16 space could be expanded to accommodate tenants with employees. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Commissioner Jenson asked what the average number of tenants would be to consider the <br /> 19 building full. Mr. Mohagen stated that the average number would be six tenants with office <br /> 20 space to accommodate an average of four to ten employees per tenant. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Vice Chair Hanson asked if they plan to place sidewalk around the entire building. Mr. <br /> 23 Mohagen stated that he has discussed this with City Staff and explained that there would be a <br /> 24 lower level exit,with stairs,to the rear of the building. He noted that the primary entrance would <br /> 25 be located at the front of the building. He stated that the plan also includes sidewalks and <br /> 26 reviewed the building access/exit points and sidewalk locations with the Commission. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Vice Chair Hanson asked if the City's ordinance requires a separate door on the lower level, <br /> 29 especially if there could possibly be a separate business located downstairs. Mr. Mohagen <br /> 30 explained that the lower level would have an exit door in addition to a door to an outdoor patio <br /> 31 area. He noted that the building code for a building of this size only requires one exit. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commissioner Galyon asked if the parking lot would be shared. Mr. Mohagen stated that the <br /> 34 tenants and their employees would share the parking lot. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Commissioner Jenson noted that the proposal indicates a deficit of parking spaces that is based <br /> 37 on the square footage of the building and asked for further clarification. W. Mohagen explained <br /> 38 that this number was based on the gross footage, which in this case is not accurate. He further <br /> 39 explained that with a building of this size the parking is usually based on usable square footage, <br /> 40 which is 9,600 square feet, divided by 300, which equals 32 parking spaces. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Chair Stromgren suggested that all parking issues, easements and usable space be further <br /> 43 clarified before they come back for final approval of the proposal. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 9.2 Ordinance Revision Discussions <br /> 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.