Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 15 <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 15.99,subd.2(a). The general rule provides that the failure of a city to deny a written request <br /> Minn Stat.§ 15.99,subd.3(c). within 60 days is approval of the request. The statute also provides that a <br /> city's response meets the 60-day time limit if the city can document that the <br /> response was sent within 60 days of receipt of the written request. <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 15.99,subd.1(c). A request is a written application related to zoning, septic systems or the <br /> expansion of the metropolitan urban service area for a permit, license or other <br /> government approval. The courts have been rather expansive in their <br /> Minn.Stat.§15 99,subd.z(a). interpretation of the phrase"related to zoning,"and almost all requests <br /> Minn.Stat.§462.358,subd.3b. affecting the use of land have been treated as subject to the law.The statute <br /> Advantage Capital Mgmt,v. does not apply to subdivision and plat approvals, since those processes are <br /> City of'Northfield,664 N.W.2d subject to their own timeframes. The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled <br /> 421 (Minn.Ct.App.2003). that Minn. Stat. § 15.99 does not apply to building permits. <br /> Minn.Stat.§15.99,subd. 1(c). A request must be submitted in writing on the city's application form, if one <br /> exists. A request not on a city's form must clearly identify on the first page <br /> the approval sought.The city may reject as incomplete a request not on the <br /> city's form, if the request does not include information required by the city. <br /> The request is incomplete if it does not include the application fee. <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 15.99,subd 3(a). The 60-day time period does not begin to run if the city notifies the <br /> landowner in writing within 15 business days that the application is <br /> incomplete. (The 2003 Legislature increased the period from 10 to 15 days.) <br /> The city must also state what information is missing. A city may want to <br /> consider developing a checklist and reviewing its zoning ordinances to make <br /> explicit what items are required. <br /> Tollelson Dev.,Inc v City of When a zoning applicant materially amends its request to rezone property,the <br /> FlkRiver,665 App.2003).N W.2d 554 <br /> Ct.App. 60-day period runs from the date of the written amendment,not from the date <br /> (Minn.(M <br /> of the original application. But minor changes to a zoning request should not <br /> affect the running of the 60-day period. <br /> Demolition Landfill Servs.v. The Minnesota Court of Appeals had ruled that failure of a motion to approve <br /> City of Duluth,609 N.W 2d 278 is not a denial. But the 2003 Legislature amended the statute to provide that <br /> (Minn.Ct.App.2000). <br /> the failure of a motion to approve an application shall constitute a denial <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 15.99,subd.2(b). provided those voting against the motion state on the record the reasons why <br /> they oppose the request. <br /> 15-16 HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES <br /> This chapter last revised 12/15/2004 <br />