My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03212006
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2006
>
PL PACKET 03212006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 12:57:50 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:26:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 03212006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•` CHAPTER 15 <br /> - J <br /> The filing requirement is intended to provide prospective buyers with notice <br /> of existing land use restrictions on a particular parcel of property. <br /> XV. Enforcement <br /> City of Hibbing v.Baratta,620 Violations of land use ordinances are misdemeanors or petty misdemeanors, <br /> NI.W.2d 58(Minn.Ct.App. as specified in the ordinance. A city may also seek assistance from the courts <br /> 2000). <br /> to enforce an ordinance through an injunction or to remove a building or <br /> Citizens far a safe Grant v, structure built without the proper permits. Citizens may also go to court to <br /> Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, enforce a city's land use ordinances. Or, a citizen could bring a timely lawsuit <br /> 624 N.W.2d 796(Minn.Ct. <br /> App.2001). to force the city to enforce its zoning ordinance. <br /> Bateman v. City of La Crescent, <br /> 2000 WL 979105,C5-99-1979 <br /> (Minn Ct.App.Jul. 18,2000). <br /> State v.Dorn, 1999 WL 153792, If provided by an ordinance, each day a violation continues to exist may be a <br /> C6-98-2001(Minn.Ct.App separate offense. <br /> Mar,23,1999). <br /> Care should be taken when gathering evidence of an ordinance violation.The <br /> zoning administrator or other city official should not go onto private property <br /> without permission of the owner or occupant or, if permission is denied, <br /> • without a search warrant. <br /> Planning&Zoning Comm'n of A claim that a city is selectively enforcing a land use ordinance must be <br /> Bemidji Township v.Schneider, based upon impermissible considerations as race,religion or the desire to <br /> C:0-99-2067(Minn.Ct App. <br /> Jun,13,2000). prevent the exercise of a constitutional right. An individual may make a claim <br /> for selective enforcement. <br /> Village of Willowbrook v. <br /> Olech,582 U.S 562,120 S Ct. <br /> 1073(2000). <br /> XVI. Judicial review and making a <br /> record <br /> Swanson v.City of Bloomington, To avoid or minimize the costly expenses of litigation, cities should always <br /> 421 N.W.2d 307(Minn.1988). keep an accurate record of meetings, including any evidence presented,make <br /> findings contemporaneously with any actions taken, and provide an <br /> opportunity for interested parties to speak. The findings of fact should be <br /> based on the record and discuss the legal standards from the city's <br /> ordinances.The findings of fact show the council fulfilled its role as judge, <br /> and justifies the decision in regard to the law and facts. The council must not <br /> base its decision solely on neighborhood support or opposition. If these steps <br /> are followed,the city should have a clear and complete record that generally <br /> limits the court's review of the city's record and eliminates the need for <br /> additional evidence at trial. <br /> HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CrrIES <br /> 15-35 <br /> This chapter last revised 12/15/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.