Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> To: Planning Commission Report No.: VII L <br /> From Kim Moore-Sykes,Assistant City Manager <br /> Date: March 18,2008 <br /> Subject: 2916 Silver Lake Court Fence Height Variance <br /> Requested Action: Variance to Fence Height of two (2) feet <br /> Date Application Received: January 8,2008 <br /> Property Address: 2916 Silver Lake Court <br /> Zoning District: Rl-A <br /> 60-Day Expires: March 7,2008 <br /> Waiver Letter Required: Yes X Date Sent: January 16,2008 No <br /> Future Action: Council Action: Approval or Denial of Variance Request <br /> Background: The owners of 2916 Silver Lake Court,Korrie and Dave Johnson,contacted Staff requesting a <br /> two (2)-foot variance to the City's ordinance Chapter 13,Section 1320.03,Subd. 3.Fence Size,that restricts the <br /> height of fences at the building setback or behind to six(6) feet. They indicated to Staff that the current fencing <br /> along the rear property line is seven (7) feet in height and is in need of repair. They would like to replace it with <br /> an eight(8) foot fence so that it is similar height to their northeast neighbor's fence,which abuts this portion of <br /> their fence. The Johnsons report that their property backs up to and is in close proximity to Silver Lake Road. <br /> They feel that without a taller fence,the traffic and street lights from Silver Lake Road will be disruptive to the <br /> enjoyment of their property. They also report that their neighbor has an eight(8) foot fence for the same <br /> reasons. <br /> Application Review: Staff received a completed application,appropriate fees and a written statement from the <br /> Johnson stating the situation and the hardship associated with their request for a variance to the City's Code of <br /> Ordinances. Also submitted as part of the application packet is a copy of a street map of the area and an aerial <br /> photo,both showing the subject property's proximity to Silver Lake Road. The Johnsons included bids from <br /> two companies for the sixty two (62) foot length of back fence <br /> Analysis. A variance is required because the property owner is planning to remove the seven(7)-foot fence and <br /> replace it with a solid wood,eight(8)-foot privacy fence. The current fence is higher than what is allowed by the <br /> City Ordinance and apparently existed as a non-conforming fence as there is no permit for its construction in the <br /> property file. <br /> Section 1665.06 of the City Ordinance outlines the requirements that must be addressed to qualify for a variance <br /> and the process by which a variance is granted. Subd. 3 states that no variance will be granted unless evidence <br /> presented supports the following facts: <br /> 2916 Silver Lake Court Fence Variance Staf Report.doc <br />