My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 04202010
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010
>
PL PACKET 04202010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:32:13 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:32:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 04202010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> August 23, 2005 <br /> Page 9 <br /> 1 project come to completion. He urged the Council to accept this Development Agreement <br /> 2 change and work with Amcon in creating the shopping center. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Councilmember Stille related the story of Spectators in 2003. He said he has heard a lot of this <br /> 5 before as far as permits being applied for and the lease being almost ready to sign. He said he <br /> 6 would like to see what is out there in terms of options and opening up for a Request for Proposal. <br /> 7 He said the City has come this far and should see what other options are there. He is concerned <br /> 8 that the operator has not done this before, and is concerned it could revert back to a bar. He <br /> 9 would encourage this applicant to participate in the RFP. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Councilmember Thuesen said he was glad to hear this would be a neighborhood restaurant vs. a <br /> 12 neighborhood bar. He said this cannot be emphasized enough. The establishment being run in <br /> 13 Anoka is a different time and place, and he said he is willing to recognize that. He said he <br /> 14 believes the operator that wants to build this establishment understands what we are looking for. <br /> 15 This process to this point has been painful. He said he is leaning toward approving this <br /> 16 operation. He added that he thinks the potential is there for a neighborhood restaurant. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Councilmember Gray agreed with Councilmembers Horst and Thuesen; he said he thinks it is <br /> 19 time to get going. He said he likes the concept and believes it will be a good neighborhood <br /> 20 restaurant. This is within walking distance from many residential units and apartments. He <br /> 21 noted he has heard from apartment residents that they would like to have something to walk to. <br /> 22 The developer is willing to pay the difference on taxes, and he thinks the Council should <br /> 23 proceed. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Mayor Faust indicated he did not feel an obligation to do anything for the sake of speed. He said <br /> 26 there is a reason there is a Developer's Agreement. We are at the 11 th hour of the second <br /> 27 extension with the Developer's Agreement. He stated he didn't find that Amcon, or whomever <br /> 28 the operator is has been forthright with the Council. He said he would like to see what is out <br /> 29 there as well. He said he doesn't doubt Mr. Peterson's ability to do what he does. Jackson Street <br /> 30 Bar and Grill is a bar and SRO is a greater bar. He commented he heard that 6,000 square feet is <br /> 31 the size needed to run a restaurant with a liquor operation. He said he has been told that <br /> 32 Applebee's has a 6,000 square foot building. He indicated that 3,900 square feet on the main <br /> 33 floor plus a basement is used for the Jackson Street Bar, so it is evident he uses more than 4,500 <br /> 34 square feet at that location. He also stated there has been time to provide sketches since June. <br /> 35 This Developer's Agreement has been trusted for two years. Now he said he would be inclined <br /> 36 to take possession of the land and would prefer to direct the City Attorney to do that. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Councilmember Horst noted that when this proposal was first created, it was because the City <br /> 39 went out for bids for proposals. No one came forward right away. The first company that came <br /> 40 forward was rejected due to a report by Ehlers. Ehlers found other developers that were <br /> 41 interested, including Amcon. Amcon is one of the top developers in the Cities and they are well <br /> 42 respected. He said he cannot explain the lack of communication in this project, but he said he <br /> 43 has faith in this operation. He said that if bids are requested again, there may not be a response, <br /> 44 and time will be wasted. He would like to keep this good partner. He said the City should stop <br /> 45 adversarial looking at Amcon and work with them. <br /> 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.