My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05182010
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010
>
PL PACKET 05182010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:31:58 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:31:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 05182010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> April 20, 2010 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 1 Chair Jensen indicated it will be important to provide information on the outdoor speaker system, <br /> 2 including the technology of the system, with the CUP and variance request. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Heinis recommended further information be provided on the number of cars in <br /> 5 the drive-thru line and the traffic pattern for the cars in queue. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 VIII.3. PARKING VARIANCEāMARKETPLACE CENTER, 2720 US HWY 88 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated staff initially met with Marty Orensten, Kaufinan <br /> 10 Sign Company, regarding installing a monument sign at the St. Anthony Marketplace Center at <br /> 11 2900 Kenzie Terrace. Mr. Orensten worked with staff to design a monument sign that meets the <br /> 12 criteria of the City's Sign Ordinance. As part of this project, staff advised Mr. Orensten that the <br /> 13 placement of past monument signs has been problematic due to the right-of-way that converge at <br /> 14 the Village Pub & Grill site. It was then proposed by Mr. Orensten that one parking stall could <br /> 15 be re-landscaped and used for the installation of the proposed monument sign. Assistant City <br /> 16 Manager Moore-Sykes stated in researching the site, staff found that Marketplace Center, due to <br /> 17 the unique characteristic of the site, lacked 31 parking stalls according to the requirements of the <br /> 18 Parking Ordinance and received a variance to the Parking Ordinance when the site was being <br /> 19 developed in 2005. Staff contacted the City Attorney regarding the situation and the possibility <br /> 20 of taking a parking space as a site for the installation of the proposed monument sign. City <br /> 21 Attorney Gilligan suggested an amendment to the original variance for parking. Staff would <br /> 22 work with the applicant to propose an amendment to reduce the number of parking stalls from 31 <br /> 23 to 30. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Mr. Dan Chaddick, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission and thanked them for their <br /> 26 service on the Commission. He stated his support of the family friendly coffee shop discussed <br /> 27 under the previous agenda item and the effort of that applicant to obtain a variance and <br /> 28 conditional use permit for the drive-thru. Mr. Chaddick outlined the parking variance request <br /> 29 and presented a picture of the proposed monument sign at the St. Anthony Marketplace Center. <br /> 30 Mr. Chaddick answered questions of the Planning Commission on the parking variance request <br /> 31 and the initial variance to the Parking Ordinance. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Chair Jensen explained that the original concept plan for the center had allowed for a substantial <br /> 34 reduction in parking for the uses combined together. The determination on the number of spaces <br /> 35 that would be given up did not evolve into the PUD,but rather evolved into a variance for square <br /> 36 footage and the parking stalls. He noted that a reduction of one stall may not be considered as <br /> 37 substantial. Chair Jensen further noted that there had been previous discussions about striping on <br /> 38 the south side of the building closest to Snyder's. However, this may not have been allowed for <br /> 39 due to the loading configuration and tenant mix. He suggested that a review of the striping <br /> 40 pattern on the south side of the building could result in the ability to retain all of the parking <br /> 41 stalls. A variance may not be necessary if the applicant were able to come up with a total <br /> 42 quantity to match the parking that currently exists. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 IX. OTHER BUSINESS. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.