My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06152010
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010
>
PL PACKET 06152010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 12:58:27 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:31:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 06152010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> May 25, 2010 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Councilmember Stille requested clarification as to the size of the proposed additional ground <br /> 3 sign in comparison to the existing signs. Mr. Wenkus replied that the existing signs are 4 feet <br /> 4 tall by 5 feet wide. The proposed 6 foot by 6 foot ground sign will be slightly larger. The intent <br /> 5 is to help the tenants with the ability of being seen from the road, and to give people in cars an <br /> 6 understanding of what is located in the center that is not visible from the street. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Councilmember Jenson questioned why the artistic conception of the directional sign does not <br /> 9 appear to be similar to the other signs. Mr. Wenkus explained that the intent is to continue with <br /> 10 the stone base that appears within the center. The directional sign is considered to be more of an <br /> 11 internal sign within the site. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Councilmember Stille inquired if there was any discussion at the Planning Commission level <br /> 14 about scaling back the sign near Wendy's due to the proximity to the road in comparison to the <br /> 15 sign located in front of Smash Burger. Mr. Wenkus replied that the intent is for the signs to be <br /> 16 the same distance back,in line with the existing signs. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Councilmember Roth inquired about the necessity of the sign in front of Walmart. Mr. Wenkus <br /> 19 replied that putting the sign at this location will provide an opportunity for the tenants in this area <br /> 20 to be recognized by the traffic off of 39'h Avenue. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Councilmember Roth noted there are still open store fronts in the development and asked if it is <br /> 23 anticipated that there will be a request for an additional sign to help capture customers in the <br /> 24 future. Ms. Thomas replied that the intent at this time is to capture the current need. Hopefully <br /> 25 this will fill the need and it will not be necessary to come back with another request. They do no <br /> 26 need to have all of the tenants on the signs; it depends on the tenant and the situation. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Mayor Faust suggested that marketing of the development as a center might be more successful <br /> 29 than additional signage. He expressed concern regarding the 31 foot height previously <br /> 30 authorized for the Cub sign. He commented that this signage is not what he envisioned for Silver <br /> 31 Lake Village and that it is likely there will be another request for additional signage in the future. <br /> 32 He expressed concern with the proposed sign location near the Freedom Gas Station in relation <br /> 33 to pedestrian traffic. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 City Manager Momson clarified that the 31 foot sign was negotiated in this PUD. The sign plan <br /> 36 was included in the entire package approved by the City Council in 2003. One thing that was <br /> 37 appealing at that time was that the developer only proposed a height of 20 feet with the Cub sign, <br /> 38 as they understood the City was sensitive to having too much signage in the center. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Mayor Faust noted that a decision must be made on the PUD amendment by June 29,2010 to <br /> 41 meet the required timeline. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Councilmember Stille commented that there may be a compromise that can be reached. He <br /> 44 noted that the package previously received by the City Council includes a height of 24 feet for <br /> 45 the Cub sign in comparison to the 26 feet discussed tonight. Mr. Wenkus stated the packet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.