PL PACKET 05172011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Pz�esidgkit.•$nd Traa~eur6s of t74e• Mirror Lade btuox.,homeowners :ori k .Re s o lits.-4i:d'al*iAa• Last w c ;ands €eci they -are �Aok�sg�ar o at- Milxor•, e� : a�:d they -U46 he Aa tQ4•' �': the ase6bigttion- boird ths . y$oug('waning to e esis that ro �s a•. royal. 't*f the r'i� osa-. .as. it lied" 'beet resented . .g .� . PP. P . P .. P to theme • lam.- Slarnaka. Th8 board hacl eapecial.ly bean glassed with the provision, •of landsdapin# which the saw ai an improvement of the P yy e4sting-condition,of-. the�p;o erty,, T1ia asaoci,atiori hkd also felt that the mini si% tN's facilitiek migIA fulfill the needof• .Dome Mirror Lake residaforiliary stor e s o e:. vac age Pac The heaving was dlosed at 5,48 P.M.- Motion .M.Motion by Mr. soprinski and seconded by tars.. Makowske to redommend Council apvroval of-. the vtiriancee necessary for the'development of. a . mirii storage faeili.ty, as proposed by Bernard Blansk6,- with no heat- ing and plumbing (except for office spade) as per survey certificate No. 5332 for Lot 20 , Block- i.2, Mounds- View Acres Second Addition subject toy (a) Council approval of the vacation of the southerly half of Sunset Lane for the project, (b) A developer's agreement from Mr. Blanske assuring construction to the City's specifications of a road and sidewalk along the porrtion .df Sunset Lane',,hich remains after the vacation, (o) Provision of marked parking for any or all office spaces (max- imum of two offices) which meet the Requirements of the City ordinance, and ('d) submission of landscaping plans detailing those indicated on his proposal, which meet the approval off` City staff, The vari.anpes recommended by the commission are: (1) A variance of 7 feet for front yard setback (Sunset Lane) . r (2) A variance of 12 feet for a side ya:zd setback (Foss Road) . (3) parking space variance of 31 stalls , resulting in a provision for 3 stalls . The Planning Commission bases this recommendation in consideration of the following: (a) The side yard variance is reasonable in that it conforms to the average setback of adjacent properties . (b) The City requirements in regard to parking spaces would be considered a hardship as the standards required do not pertain '. , to the mini storage portion of this project .