My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06212011
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2011
>
PL PACKET 06212011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:33:43 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:33:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 06212011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br /> To: Chair and Planning Commissioners <br /> From: Kim Moore-Sykes, Assistant City Manager <br /> Date: June 21,2011 <br /> Subject: Amending Zoning Ordinance 152.245 Variances <br /> Background. At the May 31,2011 City Council work session,Staff reported on the need to amend the <br /> City's Zoning Ordinance 152.245,Variances. On May 5, 2011, Gov. Dayton signed into law, Chapter 19 of the <br /> 2011 Minnesota Laws which amends Minnesota Statutes, section 462.357, subd. 6 to restore municipal variance <br /> authority in response to the Minnesota Supreme Court's ruling in Krmmmenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d <br /> 721 (Minn June 24,2010),which resulted in the cities being unable to grant variances since it was their stance <br /> that generally properties can be put to some reasonable use without a variance. <br /> This amendment that became effective on May 6, one day after the Governor signed the bill, changes the <br /> standard for granting variances from"undue hardship" to requiring the applicant to establish that there are <br /> "practical difficulties" associated with the property in complying with the City's zoning code. The new law still <br /> retains the familiar three-factor test of reasonableness, uniqueness, and essential character previously <br /> associated with"undue hardship"in explaining reasons for noncompliance with the zoning code. Also included <br /> in the new law was this additional sentence: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with <br /> the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan." <br /> The City Attorney and Staff drafted the attached amendment to the City's Zoning Code on Variances to include <br /> the new language of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 19 for the Planning Commission's consideration and <br /> recommendation. <br /> Attachments. <br /> • Revised Ordinance 2011-OOX <br /> • Letter from the City Attorney RE:Variance Ordinance amendment <br /> • League of Minnesota Cities' White Paper on the Variance Legislation <br /> F:\PIanning\Staff Reports\2011\0621201 I Variance ordinance amendment stf rpt.doc06212011 Variance ordinance amendment stf rpt.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.