Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> June 21, 2011 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 Chair Jensen opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. No speakers were present. Chair Jensen <br /> 2 closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Heinis requested confirmation that as long as a building permit to rebuild is <br /> 5 applied for within 180 days,the City cannot stop a property owner from putting the same <br /> 6 structure on their property. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes replied that this is correct. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Chair Jensen asked if the"greater than 50%of the estimated market value" standard will use the <br /> 11 County Assessor's estimated market value of the property as a whole or the estimated market <br /> 12 value of the structure only. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes indicated that the amendment provides "greater than 50% <br /> 15 of the estimated market value,as indicated by the records of the county assessor,"which would <br /> 16 include the structure and the land. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Motion by Commissioner Chaput, seconded by Commissioner Crone, to approve Ordinance <br /> 19 2011-05, An Ordinance Amending Section 152.226 of the St. Anthony City Code. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 VII.3. ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 152.245,VARIANCES <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes explained that on May 5, 2011, Gov. Dayton signed into <br /> 26 law Chapter 19 which amended Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, subd. 6,to restore <br /> 27 municipal variance authority as a result of the Minnesota Supreme Court's ruling in <br /> 28 Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka. She stated that this amendment, effective May 6,2011, <br /> 29 changes the standard for granting variances from"undue hardship"to requiring an applicant to <br /> 30 establish"practical difficulties." She noted that the new law still retains the three-factor test of <br /> 31 reasonableness,uniqueness, and essential character, and the new law requires that variances shall <br /> 32 only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the <br /> 33 ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Chair Jensen opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. No speakers were present. Chair Jensen <br /> 36 closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Commissioner Niccum stated that the Planning Commission discussed this issue at its May <br /> 39 meeting and agreed with the proposed amendment. He added that the language will be <br /> 40 consistently used by all cities. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Commissioner Heinis stated that the requirement of the applicant to establish that there are <br /> 43 "practical difficulties"will make it easier for the City to make a decision on a variance request <br /> 44 versus the "undue hardship"test. <br /> 45 <br />