Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> To: Chair and Planning Commissioners <br /> From: Kim Moore-Sykes,Assistant City Manager <br /> Date: September 20,2011 <br /> Subject: 3219 Stinson Boulevard—308SF Variance to Rebuild a Garage <br /> Requested Action: Concept Review <br /> Date Application Received: N/A <br /> Property Address: 3219 Stinson Boulevard <br /> Zoning District: R-1 <br /> 60-Day Expires: N/A <br /> Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No <br /> Future Action: Public Hearing <br /> Background. Staff was reviewing a building permit application for 3219 Stinson Boulevard to replace a <br /> garage that was severely damaged as the result of a strong summer storm. As part of the review,Staff <br /> pulled the property file and discovered that the former owner had proposed to build a "garage addition' to <br /> an existing garage in 2003. Apparently,Staff at the time was under the impression that the existing garage <br /> would be removed for the construction of the replacement garage. The building inspector noted on April <br /> 30,2003 that the owner needed to"remove all other roofed structures immediately—they are hazardous <br /> buildings." On May 26, the building inspector noted that the garage was"re-inspected not ready— see <br /> photos&correction order." Then on June 30,2003 the building inspector again sent the previous owner a <br /> correction notice and advised him to "Call for a re-inspection after all the deficiencies have been corrected <br /> and all of the framing is complete." There is nothing in the file that indicates that the owner ever removed <br /> the existing garage or called the building inspector for a framing re-inspection. Apparently,both garages <br /> were built. <br /> The current property owner,Rachel Sanzone,who purchased the property two years ago,was called and <br /> advised that she could not rebuild the size of garage that she previously had;that it had been built illegally. <br /> She responded that she used the garage and expected to be able to replace it;that she had called her <br /> insurance company about the storm damage and had contractors ready to start rebuilding. Ms.Sanzone <br /> was told she could apply for a variance but it was unlikely that the City would allow her to rebuild the 1000 <br /> SF garage. <br /> Attachments. <br /> • Site Plan from 2003 <br /> • 2011 Building Permit Application <br /> F:\Planning\Staff Reports\2011\09202011 3219 Stinson Blvd concept stf rpt.dotm09202011 3219 Stinson Blvd concept stf rpt.dotm <br />