Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 12, 2016 <br />Page 5 <br />1 concurred and stated they take the credibility of testing seriously and test results are released to <br />2 the public. <br />4 Mr. Hubmer presented five options for addressing 1,4 Dioxane: 1) blend City wells, 2) construct <br />5 deeper wells into the Mt. Simon - Hinckley aquifer, 3) purchase water from Minneapolis, 4) <br />6 purchase water from St. Paul Regional Water Services, or 5) implement treatment of 1,4 <br />7 Dioxane. He explained why staff focused on Options 3 and 5 as being the most viable long term. <br />8 With regard to Option 2, Mr. Hubmer stated the City's wells are in the Prairie Du Chien -Jordan <br />9 aquifer and reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of using the deeper Mt. Simon - Hinckley <br />10 aquifer including the need to treat to remove radium and obtain a DNR permit. The 20 -year cost <br />11 to drill three new wells into that deeper aquifer is estimated at $18 million including <br />12 construction, financing, interest, maintenance, and production costs. <br />13 <br />14 Mr. Hubmer reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of Option 3 to purchase water from <br />15 Minneapolis including loss of control on water costs. The 20 -year cost to construct the system <br />16 required to use water from Minneapolis is estimated at $35 million including capital, finance, <br />17 interest, maintenance, and production costs. <br />18 <br />19 Mr. Hubmer then reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of Option 5 to implement <br />20 treatment including significant up front capital expenditure. The 20 -year cost to treat 1,4 <br />21 Dioxane is estimated at $16.6 million including capital costs, financing, interest, maintenance, <br />22 and production costs. <br />23 <br />24 Mr. Hubmer compared the costs of Options 2, 3, and 5 and displayed concept drawings and <br />25 colored renderings to expand the treatment plant. He stated staff is asking the Council to <br />26 consider authorization to proceed with final design. If approved, the schedule would be to accept <br />27 the feasibility report, order plans, and advertise for bids on April 12, receive bids and award the <br />28 contract in August 2016, begin construction in October 2016, and start up in August 2017. <br />29 <br />30 Mayor Faust asked Mr. Fix to inform the Army that when the City does system enhancements, <br />31 it's on `their dime' and they will not try to have others pay that cost. He stated the City will be <br />32 honest and fair in how it approaches this issue, which has already been articulated by City staff <br />33 but he also wanted to make that clear. <br />34 <br />35 Councilmember Stille noted Option 5 is not solely to treat 1,4 Dioxane and asked how that may <br />36 be of benefit. Mr. Hubmer stated this option would construct an advanced system for treatment <br />37 of emerging contaminants and adding it to the City's current treatment system will result in a <br />38 robust advanced system that treats a wide suite of known and emerging pollutants. <br />39 <br />40 Councilmember Stille asked how much hydrogen peroxide will be needed for this level of <br />41 treatment. Greg Johnson, WSB, stated the concentration of peroxide is very low, less than 50 <br />42 part per billion. <br />43 <br />44 Mayor Faust opened the floor to the public for comment or question. <br />45 <br />