My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 06031997
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
1997
>
CC WORKSESSION 06031997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2016 4:23:20 PM
Creation date
7/18/2016 4:23:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br />I would like to begin by answering some frequently -asked questions. <br />Why do we need 3 pumpers in a community as small as St. Anthony? <br />The Insurance Services Office evaluates fire protection in a community and sets <br />fire insurance premiums. They have discovered that fire has a poor sense of <br />geometry and that a fire in the St. Anthony High School would require the same <br />resources to extinguish as a high school fire in New York City. In evaluating St. <br />Anthony, they have determined that we need a minimum of 3,000 GPM pumping <br />capacity to protect key buildings in the City. This capacity requires 3 pumpers. <br />We could probably get by with 2, but the resulting increase in insurance <br />premiums throughout the city would exceed the cost of buying and maintaining <br />the third pumper. <br />Why is it necessary to replace a piece of equipment with only 21,000 <br />miles on it? <br />Most of a pumper's work is done while it's standing still and so engine hours are <br />used to determine life expectancy and maintenance schedules. Interstate Diesel has <br />supplied us with a formula to convert engine hours into miles driven and, using <br />this formula, all of our pumpers exceed 100,000 miles. Our newest pumper has <br />an equivalent of 230,000 miles on it and is overdue for reserve status. <br />Another factor is the fact that nearly every urban fire truck exceeds allowable <br />vehicle load limits. The State allows us to do this and so we take advantage of it <br />(the alternative would be to purchase more vehicles to carry the same amount of <br />stuff). Consequently, the wear and tear on brakes, suspensions, and frames is <br />greater than on regular commercial trucks. <br />Why couldn't we purchase a smaller vehicle (i.e. a Suburban) to be <br />used on non -fire activities? This would save wear and tear on our <br />more expensive pumpers. <br />This idea would work if we had the space to store an additional vehicle. We still <br />require 3 pumpers and so the fire station would have to be expanded to <br />accommodate the extra vehicle. Although this idea would give our pumpers a <br />longer life expectancy, they still have to be replaced periodically and, with an <br />additional vehicle being added to the replacement schedule, the savings would be <br />minimal. Furthermore, the fire car is currently used to run many errands that <br />were previously done with a pumper. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.