My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRA MINUTES 04261994
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
HRA Minutes
>
1994
>
HRA MINUTES 04261994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 10:53:14 AM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/26/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minutes <br />• <br />April 26, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />Chair Ranallo asked the City Attorney how to proceed. <br />City Attorney Soth stated the best way to do this would be to continue meeting with the real <br />estate people and housing people can explore some of those options. He prefers the <br />townhouse option. <br />Commissioner Enrooth noted the profit and risk at $13,524 per unit is more than double the <br />amount the City is used to seeing on a project. Bob Thistle stated that Springsted tends to <br />see a range of what is taken out as profit. They break those all down from the developer's <br />perspective and arrive at a preliminary impact. <br />When Chair Ranallo inquired about extending the Kenzie TIF District, Mr. Thistle responded <br />that that was Mr. Gilligan's forte, but the potential would be there. Up to 25% could be <br />taken out of that District and applied somewhere else. Mr. Thistle indicated he is not sure <br />what is available. The City Attorney stated that generally when a law is enacted, the starting <br />date is August 1st. <br />• Judy Makowske indicated she is concerned whether the City would be willing to look at <br />whether or not they would rezone before the actual project is done. Project developers aren't <br />going to be interested in it unless they know what they can do with the property. The <br />property is zoned R2, two family residential, and a zoning of R4, multifamily would be <br />needed. Mako would like to be able to move on that fairly quickly so the property would be <br />available for this type of usage. <br />City Attorney Soth stated one question for the Planning Commission or for the staff would be <br />if rezoning that property would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. He suggested <br />that on an informal basis, the Planning Commission could have a concept review and see if <br />rezoning that property makes sense. <br />Chair Ranallo suggested that if the Council approves the concept review, then the plan would <br />be presented to the Planning Commission. He asked Mrs. Makowske to present the Council <br />with a concept review to rezone the property to R4 so that the developer could be told that <br />Mako has a tentative approval, pending justification and a public hearing. Chair Ranallo <br />asked Mr. Thistle to work with Mr. Soth and Mr. Gilligan and to develop a plan for the <br />Planning Commission's next meeting. <br />The City Attorney suggested the Council ought to request some offset funds for costs. <br />Chair Ranallo stated they would ask the developer to put $2,000 up front in an escrow <br />account and the City would keep track of it and when the $2,000 is spent, the City would <br />• contact the developer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.