Laserfiche WebLink
1 interest in the property to be demonstrated in cities like Arden Hills <br />2 and Shorewood where similar articles are to run. <br />MW 3 Mr. So th advised the H.R.A. to continue the hearing for a few more <br />4 minutes to see if any members of the public appeared. The following <br />5 H.R.A. business was conducted during that period: <br />6 JULY 12TH REGULAR AND AUGUST 4TH SPECIAL H.R.A. MEETINGS MINUTES <br />7 APPROVED <br />8 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks to approve both of the above as <br />9 presented. <br />10 Notion carried unanimou <br />11 CLAIMS <br />12 Motion by Marks, seconded by Enrooth to approve payment of $2,474.20 <br />13 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services to the Housing and <br />14 Redevelopment Authority during June, 1988. <br />15 <br />16 The hearing on the Evergreen proposal was resumed and the Chair <br />17 commented that he perceived the reason none of the neighbors had come <br />18 to this hearing might be because all the issues had been so well covered <br />19 during previous hearings on the project. <br />020 The documents which Mr. Childs had attached to his memorandum in the <br />21 agenda packet had included a copy of the Ramsey County Commissioners' <br />22 September 13, 1982 Resolution on the St. Anthony Chandler Place <br />23 Project, which the Ramsey County Executive Director advised still <br />24 reflected the County Board's concern regarding tax increment financing. <br />25 Copies of the August 23rd review of the Evergreen Tax Increment <br />26 Financing Plan by Independent School District x/282 School Superintendent <br />27 had been distributed prior to the hearing. The Executive Director <br />28 recommended the H.R.A. consider at a later date Dr. Meriwether's request <br />29 that revenues generated by the school's levy referendum be paid to the <br />30 school district. <br />31 Commissioner Ranallo advised the other H.R.A. members that he had put <br />32 money down on one of the Evergreen townhouse units and would therefore <br />33 be abstaining from all future votes having to do with the project, <br />34 including that approving the final reading on the zoning changes which <br />35 would require a 4/5 Council approval to be adopted. <br />36 The hearing was closed at 7:10 P.M. for the following motion to table: <br />37 H.R.A. Action <br />38 Motion by Marks, seconded by Enrooth to table action on the Evergreen <br />39 Townhouses of St. Anthony Project Redevelopment and Tax Increment Plans <br />• 2 <br />