Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />C 2 TY O F S T. ANTHONY <br />HO U S 2 N G AND RE D EVE L O PMENT <br />AUTHOR 2 TY M = NUT E S <br />FEBRUARY 2 4, 1 9 8 8 <br />1 The meeting was called to order at 10:15 P.M. by Chair Sundland. <br />2 Present for roll call: Sundland, Vice Chair Enrooth, Secretary/ <br />3 Treasurer Marks, and Commissioners Makowske <br />4 and Ranallo. <br />5 Also present: David Childs, Executive Director <br />6 William Soth, H.R.A. Attorney <br />7 FEBRUARY 9. 1988 H.R.A. MINUTES <br />8 Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to approve as presented. <br />9 Motion carried unanimously. <br />10 CLAIMS <br />�1 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $2,294.29 <br />2 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services to the H.R.A. <br />13 during October, 1987. <br />14 Motion carried unanimously. <br />15 STAFF UPDATE ON KENZIE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - CHILDS AND SOTH <br />16 After Staff's meeting with the H.R.A. February 9th, staff met with <br />17 both Gaughan and Lang/Nelson and indicated the City.wanted $20,000 now <br />18 and $20,000 in 30 days for an additional 15 days which would not be <br />19 applied to the purchase price for the land. There was no interest on <br />20 the part of either developer to that proposal. <br />21 Conversation that day with Gaughan indicated their willingness to put <br />22 up $20,000 for 45 days with the amount to apply to the purchase price. <br />23 Staff is waiting for a final response from Lang/Nelson, Monday because <br />24 their representative reported his boss' first reaction had been that <br />25 the City was in effect, "raising the purchase price by $40,000." <br />26 Staff's response had been to tell Lang/Nelson that the intent had not <br />27 been to raise the price of the land but that the H.R.A. was only <br />28 looking for security to assure project development and if that <br />29 happened, there was no reason the money couldn't be applied to the <br />30 purchase price. Mr. Childs added that because Lang/Nelson doesn't <br />1 have an exclusive on the project, they are unable to proceed at this <br />2 point anyway. <br />