My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRA MINUTES 02091988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
HRA Minutes
>
1988
>
HRA MINUTES 02091988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 1:28:07 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 1:28:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/9/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1 indicated that if Gaughan went with HUD a lot more time would probably <br />2 have to be taken before conditional commitment would be received. If <br />3 Gaughan did decide to obtain financing in this manner, it would <br />4 probably take 45 to 60 days before the bonds can be marketed. Before <br />5 the FHA would give final commitment the plans, specifications, etc. <br />6 would all have to be submitted. There are many steps in this process <br />7 and it would take at least 90 days to complete it. <br />8 Lincoln National Life from Ft. Wayne, Indiana, was also approached by <br />9 Gaughan. That company offered a partnership - 50% of the deal and <br />10 they would put up some of the equity. Mr. Krier indicated this would <br />11 probably be a better deal for the developer, but would also take 45-60 <br />12 days to close. <br />13 Mr. Krier feels the developers are "shopping" for the best interest <br />14 rates and this may be the main factor in the length of time it is <br />15 taking for the financing of this project. He feel sure, however, that <br />16 both the developers are still very interested in the project and do <br />17 not want to drop it. <br />18 Commissioner Ranallo indicated he is very concerned about the length <br />19 of time the potential developers are taking to get the project <br />20 started. He said that in actual fact, the project still does not have <br />21 a developer. He said he understood, as did the Minneapolis residents <br />22 concerned with the project, that the project was ready to go back in <br />•23 October. The Commissioner questioned the sincerity of either <br />24 developer for the project. <br />• <br />25 Mr. Krier indicated he felt both developers were still very <br />26 interested and sincere in their efforts toward the project and <br />27 reiterated that they were both looking for the best interest rates for <br />28 the financing. <br />29 Mr. Krier agreed with the H.R.A. that the reality is "we have nothing <br />30 on the table." There are options, however. <br />31 1. Don't deal with either Gaughan or Lang Nelson. <br />32 2. Inform either or both developers that they have a <br />33 certain number of days to complete the financing. <br />34 3. Inform either or both developers we would keep their <br />35 $10,000 (Gaughan has already given a check in this <br />36 amount to the City) and raise the cost every 15 days <br />37 until the project is financed. <br />38 When Commissioner Marks wondered if we would really get the project <br />39 going with one of these two developers, Mr. Krier again insisted that <br />40 the developers are shopping the market and when the interest rates are <br />41 economically feasible they will commit to the project. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.