Laserfiche WebLink
.-�M.ti <br />-2- <br />Commissioner Ranallo said he perceived from the Federal Register which had just come <br />out that the tax reform legislation would certainly be passed, and with the way the <br />limited partnerships were being wiped out, he had concluded there was no way the <br />senior rental project, as approved in December, could be developed as Mr. Arkell <br />had indicated. he intended. <br />Vice Chair Enrooth agreed that there was little likelihood the project which had <br />been approved by the H.R.A. "would get off the ground" without limited partnerships <br />and he asked what the City could do regarding the existing businesses in the shopping <br />center some of which he assumed are staying in that location only because they hope <br />to get relocation money to make a move. The Vice Chair pointed out that the City <br />itself had spent a large sum in architectural fees expecting to move its own liquor <br />warehouse to the Stonehouse, on "a contingency which at best is very questionable <br />at this time," and he suggested the time might have come for the City to look at <br />other renovative alternatives for that economically depressed area. <br />There was general concurrence that planning in that regard would have to be initiated <br />soon, although Mr. Childs said, he perceived the new tax legislation might also have <br />provided tax credits for low income senior rental under which many, seniors- <br />-.-living,--on the interest from their home equities might qualify for the approximately $800 <br />rents in the Arkell development, a•possibility Brighton Development was also exploring <br />at this time for some of their projects around the Twin Cities. Progress in the <br />selling of those units was explored briefly before the H.R.A. members returned to <br />the possibility of Arkell defaulting on their project. <br />•The Executive Director commented that he perceived no one could say the H.R.A. had <br />not given reasonable extensions and allowed changes which would help the developers <br />to construct the project. Mr. Childs said he perceived the H.R.A. could use the <br />$400,000 in default penalty it would receive.from Arkell to entice another developer <br />to provide some other type of project, maybe even redoing the commercial, which studies <br />years ago had indicated might work for a portion of the redevelopment project. The <br />Secretary/Treasurer commented that he considered the agreement the H.R.A. had <br />with Arkell had been based on performance and not on what might happen to the tax <br />laws. <br />There was a short report by Mr. Childs on how units in the Kenzington and Village <br />Townhomes were selling before adjournment. <br />Motion by Commissioner Ranallo and seconded by Vice Chair Enrooth to adjourn the <br />St. Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority at 9:20 P.M. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />40 <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Helen Crowe, Secretary <br />